Posted on 10/23/2004 9:53:20 AM PDT by freespirited
We just got a tip......that a major newspaper will break a front-page story Monday morning that could create a serious problem for the Kerry campaign. We don't yet have any details, but it relates to a foreign policy issue, and it will call into question--amazingly enough--John Kerry's truthfulness.
We'll watch for the story Sunday night and post it as soon as it becomes available.
Everyone said Amen.
As far as dreams go....shoot, I have singlehandedly killed Bin Laden and many Al Queada women with my fist...Great dreams...a bit aggressive perhaps...but good ones.
I think that you are on the right track.
Charles Krauthammer on Inside Washington tonight (I think that they tape Friday) said that he's seen video of Kerry saying that the U.S. did exactly the right thing by using Afghan help at Tora Bora.
It will be devastating to superimpose that on Kerry's current "Bush let Osama escape by outsourcing at Tora Bora."
Krauthammer seemed to be discussing even more pointed Kerry remarks than those quoted by you. Maybe, Kerry made the more pointed remarks on the Senate floor or some other interview around the same time?
LOL! The smell of fear must be overwhelming over at the DU! They will be near catatonic by the end of next week.
Chicago Tribune might qualify as major, they own papers in several cities as well as WGN radio and TV.
It's going to take a lot to piece the veil of MSM hubris.
Kerry can always claim that his comments were made before OIF, which changed his opinion on Afghanistan.
But is it not treason to negotiate with foreign countries if you are not part of the current administration?
bingo dixiechick....right track
You're kidding yourself if you think Hillary would give Bill any power..
I really do think they despise each other. She's a strong woman, she won't hand off power to him.
Perhaps a search of the archives of the Washington Post would turn up photos - there isn't a radical event they didn't "cover" back then (as well as now).
I know the Charter doesn't but the poster specifically says it does..... thus my question to link or cite the section..... This has become FR's version of the Urban Legend, imo. If there are amendments then someone can cite them.... All I'm looking for is a prohibition against a member of the Security Council or permanent five member becoming the Sec. Gen.
Now I can see where in the past it would be assumed no member of the Permanent Five would be Sec Gen because each Five has a blocking veto.... Probably during the cold war the USSR and the US or it's allies would have vetoed each others nominee.... just a guess. Today not sure what may happen.
Thanks for your input and thoughts.
Kerry is hiding OBL in one of Soros' overseas mansions and is keeping it from the CIA?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.