Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArmyBratCutie

I don't know if we are talking about the same things. I didn't watch the Sinclair version.

I watched the uncut version online.

If he is criticizing the uncut version, my insult stands. I thought it was forceful and made a strong point. Production qualities aside, the faces and the words of those Vets is all the film needs to get it's message across.

If you're talking about the Sinclair broadcast, I can't comment because it (thankfully as it appears) wasn't available in my area.

Before you go ripping the producers of this film, remember that they probably did it on a shoestring budget with a lot of volunteer hours from a lot of dedicated individuals that just want the truth out there.

I don't need to be bowled over, I just need to hear the truth, and I heard it tonight.


272 posted on 10/22/2004 6:40:26 PM PDT by FlJoePa (Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: FlJoePa

thats what he was posting about...NOT Stolen Honor....as his subject said....
it was NOT about Stolen Honor.....his post said the Sinclair Broadcast, that we were all watching tonight....


290 posted on 10/22/2004 6:43:04 PM PDT by ArmyBratCutie ("Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:soap, ballot, jury, ammo in this order!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson