Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey
If it was not required to be tagged, the issue is closed

Ahh,but Ohio state law requires the tagging of migratory game birds IF they are in someone else's posession other than the hunter who shot it.If you're hunting by yourself or retain posession of your own birds you don't have to tag.The tagging is to help reduce over harvesting.

68 posted on 10/22/2004 11:06:08 AM PDT by quack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: quack
Ahh,but Ohio state law requires the tagging of migratory game birds IF they are in someone else's posession other than the hunter who shot it.If you're hunting by yourself or retain posession of your own birds you don't have to tag.The tagging is to help reduce over harvesting.

As I said in my first post, I don't hung geese and claim ignorance on the requirements. I merely made that statement to keep the other poster focused on the discussion - that is, if tagging is required, it is very serious not to follow tagging instructions. He had earlier stated that if he were caught, he hoped a judge would 'forgive' him.

72 posted on 10/22/2004 11:13:03 AM PDT by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: quack

loosing "possesion" usually means transporting, taxidermy, butcher shops. If you go out hunting with your buddies, and later one of your pals takes the goose, plucks it or whatever, and cooks it up for dinner later that night, that really isn't considered "loosing possesion".

The tagging of ALL wild game law is more for those pouchers who get caught transporting illegaly taken game.


74 posted on 10/22/2004 11:19:44 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson