Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: areafiftyone

So if these PA internals are accurate, voters are intentionally choosing the candidate who promises to do more for them personally (health, job) than the one they know will better defend this country and the world. How shitty.


5 posted on 10/22/2004 8:00:27 AM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: over3Owithabrain
So if these PA internals are accurate, voters are intentionally choosing the candidate who promises to do more for them personally (health, job) than the one they know will better defend this country and the world. How shitty.

Democracy at its finest. LOL

7 posted on 10/22/2004 8:01:38 AM PDT by smith288 (Teresa Heinz thinks stay at home moms arent "real" workers. Tell my wife that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: over3Owithabrain
So if these PA internals are accurate, voters are intentionally choosing the candidate who promises to do more for them personally (health, job) than the one they know will better defend this country and the world. How shitty.

We wouldn't HAVE a Democratic party if pandering to the worst in people didn't work.

11 posted on 10/22/2004 8:02:29 AM PDT by VadeRetro (A self-reliant conservative citizenry is a better bet than the subjects of an overbearing state. -MS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: over3Owithabrain

How shitty.


Your summation is appropriate....


13 posted on 10/22/2004 8:02:56 AM PDT by Two Dawgs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: over3Owithabrain
Can't believe Specter is only at 55%.

I have my doubts about Quinnipiac's validity, although I wouldn't expect Bush to carry Pennsylvania except in a landslide, because of the voter fraud.

Dead men don't talk to pollsters!

21 posted on 10/22/2004 8:09:08 AM PDT by Sooth2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: over3Owithabrain
voters are intentionally choosing the candidate who promises to do more for them personally (health, job) than the one they know will better defend this country and the world.

Makes sense since they get the free stuff now and it will take a while for our enemies to organize and attack us. But the only way Kerry can win is if the gimme-free-stuff types and the Iraq-was-a-mistake types are mostly different, but I think for the most part these are the same stupid people.

27 posted on 10/22/2004 8:12:52 AM PDT by palmer (Solutions, not just slogans -JFKerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: over3Owithabrain

Well what do you want you have Philly which is basically a glorified suburb of NYC and then you have Allegheny County where per capita is only behind a county in Florida in terms of its number of retirees.

I don't think Kerry will win by 5 here, but given Philly's dominance in terms of population I would not be suprised if he wins. But if you look at the county by county map by the end of the night, should Kerry win, you'll see that its going to look a lot like the 2000 Red/Blue map.. large geographical regions going Bush, and a few densely populated areas primarily in eastern Philly area going Kerry.

Bush has to score big in the Philly area to take PA. He's got most of the rest of the state locked.


33 posted on 10/22/2004 8:18:31 AM PDT by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson