[unspun]

After looking through your post, I would simply ask you not to shirk your responsibility to vote for the candidate of the two who is willing to fight for our national sovereignty.

Compare what the two of them said about illegal immigration in their third debate and you will see a real difference. It may not be the difference you want, but that does not change the fact of the moral requirement to vote for George W. Bush.

[CWOJackson]

Good advice but the scorched earth crowd doesn't believe in a rationale approach to politics; it's far more fun to be vocal and irrelevant.

[B4Ranch]

>>vote for the candidate of the two who is willing to fight for our national sovereignty.<<

Who might this be? The man who wants to sign sovereignty surrendering treaties with the United Nations and leaves our borders open to an invasion of foreigners?

Are you kidding me or don't you understand what is happening in Washington today?

Do you comprehend what the words 'protect and serve' of his Oath of Office means?

They do not mean leaving our borders open nor signing sovereignty surrendering treaties with the United Nations!