Republicans for Open Borders

Michelle Malkin.com ^ | 10/22/04 | Michelle Malkin

[FITZ]

But that doesn't mean you'll get everything you want. It's time to be president, not El Presidente. You may be infatuated with Fox, but we aren't.

It's difficult to see that infatuation with Vicente Fox --- his party did very poorly in the July elections this year so it's not like he's a good leader, he had accomplished nothing --- evidenced by the even more desperate immigration in recent months and the skyrocketing violent crime rates --- and Vicente Fox has done nothing to support Bush --- not in Iraq, not in any way. He's nothing but a back-stabbing extortioner.

[Mamzelle]

What happens if he loses? I wondering if that might not help the situation.

[FITZ]

I don't see how it could help the situation because for one --- Kerry is at least as bad and Kerry knows full well that most of those coming from Mexico and especially those coming for the handouts will vote for democrats. Bush is better on other issues --- health care for example --- we're screwed on health care if Kerry wins. Abortion is another issue.

[Mamzelle]

LOL--I meant, if Fox loses. Am I wrong, but isn't he in political trouble.

[FITZ]

Also --- imagine what Kerry would do to the Supreme Court --- would we rather have Supreme Court Justice Scalia or Thomas --- or something like Supreme Court Justice Hillary? I think our hopes are with the Republican Congress --- and here in Texas Congressmen Reyes and another democrat are working on border control. There are some who realize the seriousness of this issue.

[FITZ]

LOL!! If Fox's party loses --- no big deal --- it's done nothing to fix the mess anyhow. Fox can't run again anyhow --- I think his wife of 3 years decided not to run after all --- Lopez Obrador right now is the front runner --- and he's from the PRD party.

[FITZ]

We're supposed to think Lopez Obrador is a Chavez-style Communist --- but he did attempt to do something about crime in the Capital --- he's the one who hired Guilliani. He couldn't be worse than Fox at any rate --- Fox had his chance early on to do something but he chose instead to come up with stupid demands like demanding "the Whole Enchilada" and devised an economic plan called "sending your citizens out of their homeland" economics. A complete disaster. Now that one out of five is out ---- he can only demand many many more be taken in by us.

[1_Inch_Group]

B

[1_Inch_Group]

U

[1_Inch_Group]

M

[1_Inch_Group]

P

[RnMomof7]

I saw a news piece on a town in Georgia .

They stood in a neighbor hood of formerly very nice middle class homes that is now almost all boarding houses for the illegals.

The man they interviewed used to live there until there were men using his lawn as a public toilet and garbage dump.
He said we are turning into a 3rd world nation .
They showed pictures of Mexican men standing on a corner waiting for some one to come to hire day labor .

When a car pulls up there is shoving and pushing to get in.

This used to be a nice neighborhood of newer 150,00 homes or so... no more it is now little Mexico . This is Georgia, not New Mexico .

But I guess the men in Washington do not worry about things like this (especially with their new 3oK raise)

Just a little more

"Let them eat cake"

[winker]

What he is likely to get with this nonsense is a "INTELLIGENCE FREE BILL" that plays directly into the enemies hand and continues to destroy the voters confidence!

[B4Ranch]

I'm not concerned with Kerry taking Nevada.

The other day I read "we can get 50 beautiful women to run for Miss America, but we can only get two mediocre politicians as runners for the position President of the United States". How true and how truly disgusting!

You are damn right we need to make changes. Forty years ago President Bush would have been viewed as a far left wing Democrat. If Kennedy had tried to keep the borders open there would have be a civil war.

I don't have a bleeding heart for poor foreigners and their children like President Bush does. The ideas of open borders and no child left behind sounds like something that Kofi Annan or Ted Kennedy would say. Instead it came out of the mouth of a man who says he's a Republican!

A Republican would never have pushed for the law of the Seas Treaty. He's whining about some decent immigration restrictions that we want on HR 10. Rockefeller is doing it also. Who's more Republican?

Kerry, to me is less than mediocre, where I see the President as mediocre because he is allowing an invasion of foreigners to walk across our borders in excess of 1000 every 24 hours.I cannot hold my nose and vote for him.

I have had it up to here with these people who join the Republican Party and say they are Republicans. Thankfully, my state rep, Jim Gibbons still remembers what a Republican is. He's got my entire family vote because when I call his office I get a response and he'll even listen to his supporters. If my kids had the time they would volunteer for him. Neither one of them can stand the President. That opinion came without any encouragement from me.

Having an R after your name is no guarantee that you are not a (R)INO. I will not vote the Party line until we make some large changes. Literally humongous changes.

[unspun]

After looking through your post, I would simply ask you not to shirk your responsibility to vote for the candidate of the two who is willing to fight for our national sovereignty.

Compare what the two of them said about illegal immigration in their third debate and you will see a real difference. It may not be the difference you want, but that does not change the fact of the moral requirement to vote for George W. Bush.

[Joe Hadenuf]

We watched that news segment from the west coast. We started seeing that type of activity 20 years ago. Now the east coast, and all points in between are experiencing this. It'll get much worse there. Trust me brother.

[Joe Hadenuf]

Bump that.

[CWOJackson]

Good advice but the scorched earth crowd doesn't believe in a rationale approach to politics; it's far more fun to be vocal and irrelevant.

[B4Ranch]

>>vote for the candidate of the two who is willing to fight for our national sovereignty.<<

Who might this be? The man who wants to sign sovereignty surrendering treaties with the United Nations and leaves our borders open to an invasion of foreigners?

Are you kidding me or don't you understand what is happening in Washington today?

Do you comprehend what the words 'protect and serve' of his Oath of Office means?

They do not mean leaving our borders open nor signing sovereignty surrendering treaties with the United Nations!

[Veritas et equitas ad Votum]

I guess you haven't checked out this endorsement by the American Conservative endorsing Kerry. The truth of the matter is that a message has to be sent to the GOP neocon leaders that we don't want their big government, global policemen, enormous deficits, medicare/public education expansion, invisible border security anymore.

I've had enough of the RINOs, there are 2 real Republicans that I can think of right now, Tancredo and Ron Paul. The rest are sell outs to everyone but me and you. I'm going to vote for Bush, but I'm telling you right now that there will be an enormous civil war in the GOP for the next 3 years. The closet socialists will favor Jeb/Giuliani while the real conservatives will try to get someone like Tancredo/Moore (Roy). Our country is in such great peril, only a dramatic and unabashed shift back to nationalism and public faith in God can save us. The Bush family will not save this republic. Karl Rove and Rumsfeld will not save this republic. Bill Frist, Trent Lott, Susan Collins, and Ted Stevens will not save this republic.

We must pull together, as Buchanan suggests in his endorsement, and vote against Kerry. But we must begin having real debates immediately about the failure of the Bush administration to reduce government, the mistakes being made in Iraq, the huge deficit problem, and the pathetic attempts at border security.