[Richard Axtell]

It has already been clear that the chemicals and other precursors for WMDs have existed in great volume in Iraq all along. What critics of Bush demand to see are vast stockpiles of weaponized WMDs... shells, bombs, deliverable gas, etc. Bush's critics really don't care what the facts are, they just want something to bash him with.. and "NO WMDs" suits them fine. Frankly, I think it is obvious to anyone that has paid attention, that just the stockpiles that would shut them up WERE there... until they were shipped into Syria and Lebanon. The 18 month run up to the war was ample time for Saddam to ship the weapons out. Don't expect any curiosity regarding this aspect of this issue on the part of the Michael Moore wing of the Democrat Party.

[Jeff Head]

Bush's critics really don't care what the facts are, they just want something to bash him with.. and "NO WMDs" suits them fine. Frankly, I think it is obvious to anyone that has paid attention, that just the stockpiles that would shut them up WERE there... until they were shipped into Syria and Lebanon. The 18 month run up to the war was ample time for Saddam to ship the weapons out.

Spot on.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

If our President was a Democrat and needed to prove that there was WMD in Iraq, just finding a pack of sparklers there would be enough proof for the left and media.