Posted on 10/21/2004 1:21:53 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry
CHARLESTON, W.Va. - If President Bush (news - web sites) wins West Virginia, one of the state's five Republican electors says he might not vote for Bush to protest the president's economic and foreign policies.
South Charleston Mayor Richie Robb said based on his research, an elector has "qualified discretion" when it comes to casting a vote.
"There is an implied duty to vote for your party's candidate. But I don't think it's an explicit duty or responsibility," said Robb, a moderate Republican who has a reputation of being a maverick in the state party.
Still, Robb calls it "highly unlikely" that he would cast a vote for Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites). He said he might cast his vote for Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) or another Republican instead as a protest against Bush, meaning the president would lose out on one electoral vote.
Robb's decision could end up having enormous national significance because the presidential election is expected to go down to the wire. That is exactly what happened in 2000, when George W. Bush won the White House with 271 electoral votes. To win the presidency, a candidate must receive 270 electoral votes.
"There are people talking about a tied race," said Larry Sabato, a political scientist with the University of Virginia. "This one man could change the election result, could negate the vote of 115 million Americans."
Robb's dissatisfaction with Bush stems from the president's decision to invade Iraq (news - web sites) and economic policies he says have caused the loss of nearly 1,000 high-paying chemical and manufacturing jobs in his town of about 13,000 residents. Robb has been mayor of the Charleston suburb since 1975.
A veteran who won a Bronze Star in the Vietnam War, Robb said he also is upset with campaign ads that attacked Kerry's war record.
State GOP Chairman Kris Warner said he is not worried about how Robb will vote if West Virginia again goes for the president. Bush won the 2-to-1 Democrat state in 2000 by 6 percentage points, making him the first Republican presidential candidate who was not an incumbent to take the state in more than 70 years.
"I maintain Mayor Robb will carry out the will of the West Virginia people when it becomes clear and decisive President Bush has carried the state," Warner said. Recent polls show the race is too close too call.
Robb said he objects to criticism from some who say he is a "faithless" elector. He said he views himself as a "principled elector" because he is discussing his qualms about Bush before the election.
"There have been a few people who have been downright hateful. I think that is just the nature of this election, which has been hateful," Robb said. "I won't be intimidated by the mean-spirited attacks."
Only 10 electors in history have gone against the popular vote, including one from West Virginia.
Margarette Leach of Huntington declined to vote for Michael Dukakis in 1988 even though Dukakis carried West Virginia. Leach cast her presidential vote for Dukakis' running mate, Lloyd Bentsen.
this was posted months ago.
Somebody will make him an offer he can't refuse.
This clown must be a Freeper.
Good job, democrats. This one could come back and bite you in the butt!
????
its time for your nap, zarfie
An elector may have "modified descretion" but pay back is a bitch.
As John Denver sang: "West Virginia, mountain morons...."
this guy needs to be replaced as a republican elector. if he cannot carry out his responsibilty, then the west virginia party needs to find someone who will fulfill their responsibilty. how did this self impressed nut get to this position?
Ask any Virginia repub what they think of the name Robb...
This guy will probably vote bush, but I don't know much about him. I assume he is some loser looking for attention. I recall this issue came up a few months ago with an elector. I imagine it's the same guy just lenghthening his 15 minutes of fame.
Can't somebody just get him a spot on one of those reality dating TV shows on Fox? This might satisfy his craving for attention.
All well and good but do the voters have a choice as to whether or not to select Robb as one of the electors? Only then does his statement make sense. Otherwise, he is on record as threatening to disenfranchise a whole bunch of Bush voters in his state and there isn't a thing they can do about it. Shame on the Republican Party of WV for picking an elector that will not swear to uphold the will of the people.
this was posted months ago.
Beansox, I'm glad it was reposted and that someone included the link to the original disucssion since I missed the original posting. Besides, that's what the AP did by running the story again today. I take it there is no progress between then and now.
Hmm.. I wonder why AP posted it as "news" then.
Maybe they forgot.
I smell $$$$$$$$$$, how many people can Soros buy?
The time for this guy to be "principled" was before he got selected to be a Bush elector. Now's a little late.
Sloppy reporting. The interviewer should have asked Robb if he might still defect even if his vote would cost Bush the Presidency. I'd bet the answer would be no. But of course the idiot interviewer didn't ask (or didn't report) what is really the most important aspect of this story.
The odds of this election repeating 2000 are infinitesimal. So, it is more likely that this guy's one EV won't be decisive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.