Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mason Dixon Battle Ground Polls/Internals are important....
Mason Dixon ^

Posted on 10/21/2004 11:33:10 AM PDT by PubliusEXMachina

Here are presidential race results from battleground states polled by Mason-Dixon Polling and Research for MSNBC, Knight Ridder and in Nevada, the Las Vegas Review Journal.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: battlegroundpolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
This may have been posted eariler, but you should look at the internals that are graphed here. As usual the only worriesom one is Ohio. I hope the Pres gets out there and stumps with Rudy, McCain and Ahhnold...by the way what are the track records of Mason Dixon?
1 posted on 10/21/2004 11:33:11 AM PDT by PubliusEXMachina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina
...by the way what are the track records of Mason Dixon?

Excellent. Sterling.

2 posted on 10/21/2004 11:34:50 AM PDT by Petronski (On the land in the air on the sea, let's swing out to Victory. --Fats Waller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina

I've heard Mason-Dixon is the best on state polling. I also think Bush is up by 3-5% in Ohio.


3 posted on 10/21/2004 11:35:55 AM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina

best in the business


4 posted on 10/21/2004 11:36:00 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina

They were the most accurate polling firm in 2002, missing only 1 race out of 23 and being within something like 1.8% of the actual results. Compare to Zogby who missed about 1/3 of the 2002 races.


5 posted on 10/21/2004 11:36:12 AM PDT by The G Man (George W. Bush: "Got wood?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina

Ohio internals are worrisome. The other states look much more assuring.


6 posted on 10/21/2004 11:44:18 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina

Mason Dixon ACED 2002 22 out of 23 races right


http://www.ncpp.org/2002SenGovPoll/2002ElectionPolls.html


7 posted on 10/21/2004 11:49:25 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Are you kidding me? Zogby missed about a third of the races in 2002? Thats horrible. I still have to stick with his last 2 presidential polls as beung the best.

Any info on Zogby's 2002 predictions?

8 posted on 10/21/2004 11:58:58 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

ping


9 posted on 10/21/2004 11:59:49 AM PDT by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Zogby's 2000 final presidential poll was NOT the best. The Fox/OD poll was the best. See link below:

http://members.cox.net/fweil/FinalPolls2000.html


10 posted on 10/21/2004 12:03:07 PM PDT by TigerDSL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator; All

I used to think that in order for me to be totally comfortable with the polls I need to see W's numbers above 50% and outside of the MOE and all polls have basically the same results. Now I think that we have to overcome the MOF - Margin of Fraud. We need about 3-5% above Kerry to overcome the MOF.


11 posted on 10/21/2004 12:03:30 PM PDT by kcbob (Dims - we always get 100% of the dead cemetery voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Here ya go:

Zogby worst 2002 pollster

Polling Organization Number Of Polls Average Error On Candidate Races With Wrong Winner
Mason-Dixon
23
1.8%
1
Zogby International
17
2.5%
5
Research 2000
13
2.1%
2
Gallup
7
1.4%
1
Quinnipiac College
4
2.0%
0
All Others
95
2.7%
12
TOTAL
159
2.4%
21

12 posted on 10/21/2004 12:04:46 PM PDT by The G Man (George W. Bush: "Got wood?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

So Gallop was the best in 02. I do think Zogby was the only one to have Sunua up in NH and got that right, but I think he was his posters and kept them privite until after the election so maybe he brag to look good.


13 posted on 10/21/2004 12:27:30 PM PDT by Paul8148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PubliusEXMachina

Does Ohio have partisan registration? I can't find any data on it. How realisitic is M-D's 38-39-26 D-R-I breakdown for Ohio? I know neighboring PA is 48-42-10 in D-R-I.


14 posted on 10/21/2004 12:28:36 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148

Yeah, but look at Mason Dixon ... 22/23 correct.


15 posted on 10/21/2004 12:31:56 PM PDT by The G Man (George W. Bush: "Got wood?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

The OHIO numbers are mixed:
The best number - 45% somewhat or very conservative with a TON of moderates.


16 posted on 10/21/2004 12:32:30 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

Thank you, that is very explanatory. Zogby got 29% of his predictions wrong in 2002. That is a BAD number. Its twice the amount (and percentage) of the polls that got 14-15% wrong.


17 posted on 10/21/2004 12:34:59 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker

They do, but upwards of 60% are independent. I think M-Ds numbers match exit polling from 2000. The 38/39 may have been reversed but that means nothing.


18 posted on 10/21/2004 12:37:08 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The G Man

How did they do in 2000?

No offense, but the reason pollsters were off in 2002 was because they underestimated Republican turn-out compared to 'RAT numbers. Do we know if their model is flexible to account for varying levels of turnout from year to year, or are they citing 2002 turnout percentages? Because I think that Republicans are an energized as ever, but the 'RATs are also much more energized than 2 years ago.


19 posted on 10/21/2004 12:39:03 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

people.....please remember...the gay marriage issue is on

the ohio ballot....that will assure a big conservative

turnout......ITS THE TURNOUT,STUPID.....NOT THE POLLS.

GW will win Ohio....take that to the bank


20 posted on 10/21/2004 12:39:10 PM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson