Posted on 10/21/2004 8:28:16 AM PDT by sportutegrl
Me thinks they don't want the military vote.""
AGAIN!!!!!!
That's nuts. After a liberal judge violates our soldiers right to vote, Democrats will explain that this is just another reason the U.N. should manage our elections.
Mark A. Aronchick
In the Inquirer in February, Aronchick discussed what he described as the prevailing disdain for a president who was "playing to base fears."
"Our anger is that fundamental. It is primal. These are evil forces we are up against," Aronchick said.
"Fundamental" and "primal" enough to debase our voting process...?
I wonder if this scumbag liberal degenerate's head inhabits a rather "tiny universe."
I really like your idea. It would be a win/win situation. First, the military voters win and secondly, the President wins. (almost like the Berlin airlift)
The military ballots are being done via the Internet or the military will shop them over in special planes. One way or another, they will get there and back. I've already heard where special care is being taken to get them back here on time.
Yes there is a write in option for Nader, but in PA you have to list all 12 electors by name to write him in or it doesn't count.
Only a few counties have mailed out ballots, suprise Philly is one. Most are waiting until the dust settles. Bush worries that ballots with final Nader issue wrong may be counted "invalid". Nader appealed to US Supreme today. Most counties are waiting until issue is final before mailing.
I missed the best quote from the article.
Point taken. I wasn't trying to hide anything, I assume most would follow the link and read all.
To write in Ralph Nader in PA, you have to write in all of his electors by name.
Well, Nader appealed to the US Supreme, but I really don't think that helps this dilemma.
1. I knew Nader would appeal to US Supreme, (he did today)
2. Some ballots will have gone out with Nader on, some with Nader off. Dems army of 10000 lawyers will almost certainly try to get the 'incorrect' ballots disqualified.
Of course you know he was appointed by Rendell to monitor the voting here in PA. Is he partisan, ya think?
Can judges be disbarred by a higher court?
How do you stop the judge??
I can think of several ways criminal judges had to be stopped in the past - when people had the courage and conviction of RIGHT and WRONG!
My voting place will be monitored by at least 3 activist repubs, including moi!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.