Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FormerLib
It was an ad published in the Washington Post.

So the boob paid $104, 655.60 his own money, to support the Washington Post?

Typical RINO.

12 posted on 10/20/2004 5:11:03 PM PDT by Willie Green (Hawkins/Tonnelson in 2004!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green

I can't let that pass Willie. The Washington Post might be a liberal leaning newspaper but it's got a heck of alot of circulation, and besides you don't call a patriot a "boob", your just envious of his money. I want to say much more but I am an adult.


13 posted on 10/20/2004 5:50:34 PM PDT by St.Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Putting this ad in the Washington Post reached hundreds of thousands of liberals. He could have run it in any number of pro-Bush newspapers, but what would it have accomplished. He spent a ton of his own money, and he wanted to reach the people that NEED to read it. "Preaching to the choir" would have been a waste of money.


19 posted on 10/20/2004 7:59:42 PM PDT by wagglebee (Benedict Arnold was for American independence before he was against it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Why would you think this guy is a RINO? He probably ran that ad in the Post to get the widest possible circulation well as stick it in the eye of most liberals who read that paper. That is what I call in your face advertising and he made his point.
20 posted on 10/21/2004 2:38:18 PM PDT by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson