Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam the Sham

Even on a Kia, though, you get things that you didn't get in a VW Beetle in 1964. You have to pay more for more things--that's just the way it goes.

A 1964 Beetle was a piece of crap. A Kia in 2005, while not the best car in the world by any stretch, is light years ahead of what a VW Beetle was in 1964.

I don't see your point. You're getting more. In life, a good rule of thumb is that you should expect to pay more when you're getting more.


100 posted on 10/21/2004 7:43:18 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Publius Valerius

I should amend this by saying that if GM or Ford introduced a car that had the same specs as a 1964 VW Beetle today, they wouldn't sell one--not one.

40 hp engine, no air conditioning, unsafe, etc., etc. The only reason people buy those things now is because people, strangely enough, are enamored with the past--as you seem to be. It wasn't always better, and the days weren't always good. Indeed, they are a helluva lot better now.


101 posted on 10/21/2004 7:50:10 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: Publius Valerius
You have to pay more for more things--that's just the way it goes.

Again, you are NOT paying more. Adjusted for inflation, you are NOT paying more. Adjusted for inflation, a Kia costs what a Volkswagen Beetle did.

104 posted on 10/21/2004 8:12:48 AM PDT by Sam the Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson