Funny that in this era of face scanning recognition in your state legislature's buildings, nobody has demanded face recognition software at polling places? Don't even set it up to access a database. Just set it up to run a file of the voters during election day, then constantly scan it's own files written that day. Single faces will start voting the second time about a half hour after they cast their first vote. It would not violate anyones privacy until they voted the second time, and third, and fourth,and............
that's exactly right - the Dems don't want these people to show up, they just want them on the registration rolls, and to know who they are, so their votes can be cast for them by someone else.
to be honest, I don't see how this fraud effort can be stopped by our side. as you say, they just cruise around from precinct to precinct, voting in each one as a different person.
The problem in Ohio, now that some court has OK'd provisional voting, is that the people who are prepared to vote fraudulently, no long have to show up at the precinct at which the poll workers would have the registration on record.
The people prepared to vote fraudulently, may enter ANY precinct and vote.
A worsening problem will turn out, that many REPUBLICANS will find that they voted twice, once where they reside and once where the fraudulent voter voted provisionally for them. No problem, you say, well, tell it to the judge; as each signature, yours and your fraudulent effort ... each REPUBLICAN shall have to prove that they did NOT place the fraudulent vote in the remote precinct, nor did they make *THAT* signature at the remote precinct.
A daunting task for the boards of elections.
Yet, back to the matter of the DEMOCRAT voting twice ...
The daunting task will be for the boards of election to reject the fraudulent votes, and for each, face the publicly posed ire of the "disenfranchised" (Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton chorus sings here) and the "intimidated" (Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton chorus sings here again).
For every duplicate, triplicate, quadrupliate, quintuplicate, etc. vote placed fraudulently by the DEMOCRATS, the board of election will have that many tasks to prove that the votes are frauds.
It is not "yawn" like the old days of a few hundred here and there.
The problem is with tens of thousands of votes.
At the board of elections, every single provisional ballot will have to be confirmed by due process, which will take more than a month, which means that the Secretary of State will not be able to make certification of the vote results.
Ironically, I've never ever met a single person who was afraid to vote on anything in the United States, except for members of the affilations of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. who are very afraid of losing their health and livelihood if they do not please the A.F.L.-C.I.O. hierarchy.
You're right about that. My #@&#'n father-in-law, a long time union member has told me that he actively took part in stuffing ballot boxes in Illinois in past years.