[Question Liberal Authority]

Likely Voters (1): Adults who are registered to vote and say they are "absolutely certain" to vote (n=820). Likely Voters (2): Adults who are registered to vote and say they are "absolutely certain" to vote and that (if they were old enough) they voted in 2000 (n=755).

Does this mean that voters are not excluded if they were not old enough to vote in 2000? If so, it is oversampling people who are 18-22 years old, and automatically disqualifying anyone over 22 who did not vote in the 2000 election.

[MichelleWSC]

"Does this mean that voters are not excluded if they were not old enough to vote in 2000? If so, it is oversampling people who are 18-22 years old, and automatically disqualifying anyone over 22 who did not vote in the 2000 election."


---Not sure what you meant or Harris meant LOL This poll, like Kerry, flip-flopped all over the place with a kind of logic that would give most doctors cause to have it committed to the funny fare for an evaluation.

There was a link posted here a few weeks ago to an article that broke these polls down and basically said Harris was worthless poll. And even though they have some good to okay numbers for Bush I think I'll stick with the article and say they are worthless.