Posted on 10/19/2004 10:27:19 PM PDT by crushelits
Yeah, but that other 20% is the killer.
This article will come as a great relief to all those Los Angeles ERs and hospitals closed because of illegal Mexicans flooding the ERs with uncompensated care.
Gee, things sure have changed since June 25, 2004!
Now-now. Can't go confusing the Leftists with inconvenient facts! ; )
lol
Is that nationally?? Maybe they should just try doing the study in LA, San Diego, Phoenix, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio and El Paso.
All I can say is that if 80% of emergency room patients are insured, why are emergency rooms closing around California. I wonder what the percentage of people in Calif. are uninsured? Virtually all of them go the local emergency room for a headache. And virtually all of them aren't suppose to be here.
Garbage.
According to numbers the largest number uninsured are 18 - 39 and choose to use money for recreation instead of insurance; most unisured make over $50K a year.
Uninsured doesn't mean without healthcare -- the poor get healthcare through Medicaid and the elderly through Medicare. A large number of the elderly have secondary policies and the poor elderly have Medicaid secondary.
So, if these numbers are correct and 75% of emergency room visits have insurance -- I assume then a large number of hospitalized have insurance -- so what exactly is driving insurance up by double digits when they are outsourcing claims processing overseas? and most insurance is handled electronically these days? CEO Salaries????
I cannot imagine any business giving away 20% of its product and surviving.
Try it with a restaurant, for example, and see how long you can stay open.
Whoever authored this study has no concept of economics.
Two things. Aging population and diseases that used to be fatal are now very expensively treated. The dichotomy is that health care is so good now that many people that would have died 20 years ago now have treatments that keep them alive for decades but at a very high cost.
That too but with the advent of transplantation of kidneys, livers, hearts and lungs along with medications that control everything from diabetes to high blood pressure along with longer and longer cancer remissions people are just living longer than they did a short time ago but the cost of keeping them alive is extremely expensive. This is not a bad thing BUT it is a reality and it is costly.
Down here on the border in south Texas more than 75% of the total health care is paid by the government. Less than 25% of the people have health insurance.
So, 110 MILLION visits; that leaves around 20 MILLION uninsured "visitors". Take the lowest possible cost of an emergency room visit (maybe $500), and you will begin to see the problem. Of course, many of these visits will end up in tens of thousands of dollars in costs...so add accordingly.
Of course, the article also says that people that ARE covered are covered by private or public insurance. So add to that AGAIN, the difference between what the government pays, and what the hospitals actually charge; for those who are covered by "public" means.
We all pay the difference.
Plus, insurance companies invest money in the market. If they guess wrong...well we can't have them losing money because of their own mistakes now, can we?
New medicines and treatments; tech. innovations; the ever-increasing cost of R and D; a fat, sedentary population that has little interest in prevention. Add a flood of illegal immigrants and you get our current situation.
Where is the site of the report? I'd like to read between the lines...
------------------------------------------------
Now we are to subsidize the crisis with phone taxes? We pay one way or another!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.