Statistically, if 1/100 of one percent (.001%) of society has sexual birth defects, this poses very little threat to the fabric of a healthy society.
Using a genetic anomaly as a justification for sentencing a huge number of innocent kids to life without either a mommy or a daddy is illogical and mathematically unsound.
Actually that is the statistics (one in 10,000) for transsexuals. When more minor forms of genitial birth defects are compiled together the rate can be as high as 1 out of 250 to 500 people.
Using a genetic anomaly as a justification for sentencing a huge number of innocent kids to life without either a mommy or a daddy is illogical and mathematically unsound.
There is a logic gap in the above statement. How exactly does ones person's genetic anomaly prevent other children from having a mommy or a daddy?
Allowing the anomaly to define the norm is idiocy.