Posted on 10/19/2004 5:17:28 PM PDT by TaxRelief
Actually, if you have studied history, you will know that the tactics of politics, and lawyers for that matter, haven't really changed in the past 2300 years.
Christianity grew out of Judaism and most early Christians were Jews.
Yes and no, the Jews originally rejected Jesus and the christians did not really embrace old testament Judaic teachings until after the first Bible was compiled during the rule Roman Emperor Constantine in the 4th (300's) century AD.
Just answer the Question and stop dancing around it your starting to bore me . What rights are homosexuals denied? Answer the questions then we can debate all the crap your throwing in my face while not answering my question. I answered you now answer me, If your not willing just say so!
What more evil Godless movement in the world is there than 'bureaucracy'!
I sat right there watching him tell Charles Gibson that he thought a woman's decision to abort her child was a "private matter" and nobody should tell her what to do. I also heard him state that abortion should not be made illegal, except for PBA. O'Reilly is pro-Abortion no matter what he says about his personal opposition to it. He's just as hypocritical as kerry on this.
But how is he lying? You haven't been reading Al Franken's book, have you?
O'Reilly doesn't claim to be a conservative or a Republican or a Libertarian. He says he's a registered independent. Sounds right.
Also remember that even today, almost 10 years after the declassification of the Venona Intercepts, the Communist media is still lying about McCarthy:
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/kbank/profiles/mccarthy/
In history textbooks pushed within our public education system, the truth is not told about McCarthy.
I sat right there watching him tell Charles Gibson that he thought a woman's decision to abort her child was a "private matter" and nobody should tell her what to do. I also heard him state that abortion should not be made illegal, except for PBA. O'Reilly is pro-Abortion no matter what he says about his personal opposition to it. He's just as hypocritical as kerry on this.
It depends, do you view marriage as a right or a privilege. Honestly as I said in a previous post to you, I am not sure.
Answer the questions then we can debate all the crap your throwing in my face while not answering my question.
I am just pointing out possible holes in the 'husband and wife, marriage amendment' arguement and you just don't want to listen. It is best to get this holes addressed BEFORE you put it in the Constitution.
What rights are homosexuals denied?
You didn't hear a word I said, did you? Massive, runaway government bureaucracy is only one of many manifestations of the enslavement of a people. But all of them arise from the same source -- the denial that those freedoms we cherish come from God and God alone. Read our basic founding documents. Turn your back on God and it won't matter what else you do. He comes first, He gets his right off the top.
I trust that you don't have any of your loved ones in that cesspool!
You point out some good resources with which all Americans should be acquainted. Additionally, while you can slog through the Venona Papers, you can also be inspired by Whittaker Chambers' Witness, or you can take the lazy approach and laugh through Ann Coulter's summary in Treason.
Registered Independent status only means you are not affiliated with any political party. You can be anything you want and still be an "independent." You can be a Maoist, you can be an anarchist, you can even be a phony, lying liberal like O'Reilly.
Aren't they denied the right to slovenly dressing habits (or is that just a coincidence)?
"It is glaringly obvious..."
Exactly. Gramsci was stating the obvious. The writing was on the wall. The wheels were all ready in motion.
MacCarthy was right, too.
But that still doesn't answer the question of "why?" the social controllers are achieving greater success in certain liberal subgroups than others.
The Homosexual Mafia has a mind of its own. They are less likely to bow to communists than Christians are. They have their own plan and it is the same plan that they had 2000 years ago when they began the process of causing the fall of Rome. It's all about shaking off the "chains" of Christianity and Judaism.
What lie has he told (on the air)?
I answered your question. You just refuse to accept my answer, which was in the form of a question because I not sure on the subject.
Neither. Marriage was always about the offspring, it was never about the adults. Marriage protects the welfare of children and as a result society is enhanced.
I read every word you stated in that reply, which was; Without God, nothing you do will come to anything. The Founders understood this. You have either forgotten or you never learned it. An immoral people cannot remain free.
It's your own fault you did not elaborate on the subject.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.