Soros, Sperling and Lewis are also the major funders of the pro-drug initiatives and the pro-drug websites. They know how to saturate the search engines such that if a person (particularly a student) tries to research a drug issue, he may never get past all the pro-drug sites and their propaganda.
ping
And why wasn't I invited? An oversite, MY A$$!
Bilderbergers in sheep's clothing?
I have heard that George Soros is also a big backer of Phoenix University which has campuses in most big cities.
I have also heard that Soros uses the university to promote his legalization of marijuana agenda.
I heard this in San Diego. Anyone else heard similar comments.
Remember the Soviet woman journalist who predicted 9/11 and said that there were powerful people trying to bring down the dollar and that they had $XXXXXXXXXXX assets?
This reminds me of that.
billionaire Peter B. Lewis, chairman of the Cleveland, Ohio-based insurance company Progressive Corporation. ... One of Lewis’ top agenda items has been the decriminalization of marijuana ... ."
Now, I ask you, do you think Lewis' Progressive Insurance Company will pay claims for a stoned driver? Would be interesting to see their advertising on using drugs and driving.
At one point we carried Progressive, thru AAA no less. They really should be looked into.
Hmmmmm ..... Aspen. I wonder if Bill Joy had anything to do with this? ......
In this temporary, passing world we live in money is the ultimate power, it buys mansions, fame, politicians, judges, women, yachts, islands and the best medical care on earth. And these billionaires have ascended to the pinnacles of earthly power with their uncountable wealth. With this in mind, I wonder what the people who attended this meeting really want to accomplish?
In other words, they met toghether to see if they could BUY the election for Kerry.
BTW, I was VERY suspicious when I first heard of Progressive Insurance and steered clear of it. Last yearm my suspicions were confirmed; the name of the company DID reflect the political beliefs of the owner.
I think Repubs could score big with a humorous commercial parodying these creeps. Make an ad with sleazy looking guys in a dark room, talking about how they want to buy the election. Narrator can say something like "don't let billionaires choose for you," or something along that line. Anyone agree?
These corporate interests use the environmental angle to try and go around our "bottom up" structure of government by imposing top down structures that use hydrological boundaries that cross political lines. We are experiencing that on the Klamath where they are trying to establish a new bi-state bureaucracy whereby all natural resource use will be managed under the guidance of agency folks according to "science."
It is also interesting to note that compliance with environmental regulations is so costly that small business owners can't comply. The big companies can afford the licensed biologists, hydrologists, foresters, geologists, archaeologists required to complete the required management plan and accompanying environmental documents and review process. For instance, the CA Dept. of Fish and Game says that the CEQA environmental review process for permits to continue to irrigate land with water where threatened coho live, will be a minimum of $150,000. Who in h#ll has that kind of money if they are a small family farmer, rancher or timberlot owner?
It is clear that these regulations are intended to destroy small business competition and the middle class.
Progressive canceling bump! Got a better rate from Allstate anyway.