[First_Salute]

For the record, I've read Mr. Libscomb's article, in which he states:

And it couldn't have been an honorable discharge, or there would have been no point in any review at all.

He is not correct in his estimate.

Both voluntary and in-voluntary separation that results in an Honorable Discharge, are S.O.P.

Usually in the case of in-voluntary, there is a review performed by some Navy review board. Such instances occur typically when there is a purposeful reduction in force by the Dept. of Defense and/or the Dept. of the Navy.

That given, the matter of there being quite a lot of evidence to support some kind of official and/or un-official and/or politically-influenced (either way) investigation of Lt. Kerry's activities and relationships with the avowed enemies of the Unites States, probably existed.

[bluecollarman]

I think Kabar has pretty much debunked the phony discharge
thing. At least to my satisfaction.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1248536/posts?page=43#43