Posted on 10/19/2004 8:32:13 AM PDT by Fatalis
An Open Letter to Senator John F. Kerry
From Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr.
October 19, 2004
Dear Senator Kerry,
I never met my uncle Will. He was a lieutenant in the Navy during WWII. He was killed in action on his PT boat in the Pacific. For his fatal wounds, he received the Purple Heart posthumously.
The first-captain of my West Point class took a bullet through the heart while leading a South Vietnamese airborne battalion into combat. For this fatal wound, he was awarded the Purple Heart posthumously.
My senior year roommate at West Point became a tunnel rat. A booby trap explosion killed him in the tunnels of Duc Pho. The army awarded him the Purple Heart posthumously. My plebe year roommate lost an eye and became permanently crippled. For his extensive wounds, he received the Purple Heart.
My battalion commander in Viet Nam was one of the bravest men I ever knew. He went out ahead of the troops in his light observation helicopter to find and kill enemy before they had a chance to fire on his men. That's how he died. For his fatal wounds, he received the Purple Heart posthumously.
My words pale in their import compared to the terse comment of a high school classmate of mine. We played lacrosse together in Baltimore. He went to the Naval Academy and upon graduation became a marine. This past July at our annual lacrosse crab feast, I asked him what he thought of your Purple Hearts. He said, "Bob, nine of us lieutenants went over there together, and only three of us came back. All three of us who survived spent at least a month in the hospital recovering from wounds we suffered in combat."
You didn't need any recovery time from your three alleged "wounds." How does one get "wounded" and yet not need to recover from those "wounds"? With wounds comes suffering. Where was your suffering? How could you merit a Purple Heart when you weren't even a casualty? You did not earn your Purple Hearts; you wrangled them from the system through deception so you could go home early and get out of eight months of combat. That is despicable and shameless. During the democratic convention, your flagrant boastful show of your "heroism" gave the impression that you had been a man in the thick of combat, when in fact, you had been a man on the very edge of it, all the while slyly conniving your way out of it. Instead of "Reporting for duty," you should have said, "Derelict in my duty." I marvel at your pomposity, and at the astonishing facility with which you present your phony war record as fact to the American people.
Let's compare your wounds with those of a West Point classmate of mine and his men. As my classmate directed artillery fire onto suspected enemy positions, shrapnel from an enemy mortar ripped into his leg. A medivac chopper took him to the Americal Division field hospital. When he returned to his company two weeks later, many new faces met him: the lieutenant who had taken over had marched the company into a u-shaped ambush resulting in two-thirds of the men being killed or wounded. Those wounded in that battle didn't have to put themselves in for the Purple Heart, Senator Kerry.
You exhibit the characteristics of a Narcissist. Narcissus, for whom this malignant character defect is named, fell in love with his image in a pool of water. As with Narcissus, your image has become the focus of your life. This image of yourself with which you are enamored, so greedy for recognition and praise, is only two dimensional: it has breadth and width, but no depth. And while your image may appear grand and heroic on the surface, there is no substance to it. My high school marine friend and my West Point classmate, true heroes, didn't take movie cameras with them to Viet Nam, but you did-with the express purpose of recording your imaginary exploits and feeding your grandiose image of yourself.
The truth is you faked combat wounds in Viet Nam, and your actions were devious and self-serving. You were a "Purple Heart hunter," just as the Swift Boat Vets say. Narcissus was an actor, and so are you.
I don't understand how any veteran, or any member of a veteran's family, or any sane-thinking American could even consider voting for youa man who faked Purple Hearts in wartime. A man who will fake Purple Hearts for the sake of glorifying his image has no integrity and misdefines truth as whatever enhances the power and prestige of that image. A man without depth and substance stands for anything and everything-so long as his image is glorified. Narcissists such as you cannot be trusted; and they can be very dangerous, especially when they become paranoid about protecting their image, especially when they occupy positions of great authority and consequence. The issues in this election are truthfulness and character, and you lack both.
In 1971, I became a regional coordinator for Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) for a short time. I and many other vets were very angry at our government. We had experienced horror, terror, trauma, and grief in a no-win war and couldn't see the reason for it. We felt betrayed by our government and our military leaders. You stepped in and became our spokesman.
What enabled you to rise to the leadership of VVAW? What caused us, back then, to respect a four-month mini-veteran of the war? The answer is your medals: your phony medals for valor and your three phony Purple Hearts. Your congressional testimony about the war began with your own assertions that you had received the Silver Star and three Purple Hearts. What better spokesman than an heroic, thrice-wounded veteran! Our mistake was that we all assumed you were an honest and good man. But well before your antiwar days, you had decided to trade your integrity for the spotlight, and to barter your loyalty for vain political ambitions.
Most of us in VVAW expressed our outrage with government war policies through speeches, marches, and protests. We told the truth about what we saw and did in Viet Nam and we demanded from our leaders acknowledgement and change. You usurped the leadership of VVAW under false pretenses and dragged it in the direction of Jane Fonda and collaboration with the enemy. If, God forbid, you are elected president, in what awful direction will you and your foreign-born-and-raised wife drag our country?
Your deceit is an explicit slur upon my uncle Will's Purple Heart award, and you mock all other veterans who made the supreme sacrifice or suffered genuine wounds in combat throughout our nation's history. Your rise to prominence is based upon your abominably perverse desecration of our ideals; you have trivialized and demeaned the sacred and the solemn, and no amount of fluent sophistry or braggart pretense can cover it up.
Your conduct goes far beyond dereliction of duty. You betrayed your comrades in Viet Nam; you betrayed the trust of antiwar veterans, and now your self-fabricated credentials and continued lies contaminate the political process.
Remember the professor a few years ago who lied about being a Viet Nam veteran? His college reprimanded and suspended him for foisting such an abominable sham upon a few hundred students. I ask you in closing, Senator Kerry, what punishment is fitting for a man who fabricates medals as sacrosanct as the Purple Heart, and who continues to lie about his Viet Nam service to the entire world?
Yours truly,
Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr.
When Officers in combat put their own interests before their mission, they endanger not only the mission, but their country, their families, those they are fighting for and ultimately their own men.
"Officers" like Kerry evoke a visceral reaction from those of us who have actually had the experience. I, too am a VietVet. My father was one of the original SeaBees in WWII. Both of my older brothers served in the Navy during the Korean War. My service was in the Army, '69 thru 71, MACV in 1970. By some miracle, none of us were ever wounded, but we all had comrades who were - some of whom did not survive.
It is from out of that same deep well of emotion that conjures up love, admiration and respect for those men, that comes the visceral response to pretenders like this prevaricating coward.
If this is not a call to action, we will never hear one!
Write letters, call congressmen, express outrage...but most importantly, GET OUT THE VOTE AND SHOW THIS PHONY THE DOOR. (Then we'll put on the pressure to expose and prosecute him...The MSM loves to kick them when they're down.)
I am not a hero, merely an ex-GI who had the honor the serve with men who were. (And all of us stayed for our full tour.)
I think Kabar has pretty much debunked the phony discharge
thing. At least to my satisfaction.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1248536/posts?page=43#43
Hmmm... I don't know. Here's his e-mail though.
RBowieJ@comcast.net
I thought the same thing. Googling as much as I could, the guy does seem to be legit. I would still like to know more about him though.
I have one question about this discharge story, why didn't anyone ask about it in the previous thirty years, before the last discharge was issued?
When Officers in combat put their own interests before their mission, they endanger not only the mission, but their country, their families, those they are fighting for and ultimately their own men.
"Officers" like Kerry evoke a visceral reaction from those of us who have actually had the experience. I, too am a VietVet. My father was one of the original SeaBees in WWII. Both of my older brothers served in the Navy during the Korean War. My service was in the Army, '69 thru 71, MACV in 1970. By some miracle, none of us were ever wounded, but we all had comrades who were - some of whom did not survive.
It is from out of that same deep well of emotion that conjures up love, admiration and respect for those men, that comes the visceral response to pretenders like this prevaricating coward.
If this is not a call to action, we will never hear one!
Write letters, call congressmen, express outrage...but most importantly, GET OUT THE VOTE AND SHOW THIS PHONY THE DOOR. (Then we'll put on the pressure to expose and prosecute him...The MSM loves to kick them when they're down.)
I am not a hero, merely an ex-GI who had the honor the serve with men who were. (And all of us stayed for our full tour.)
ping!
ping
Possible explanation...tunnel rats were volunteers who were not picked by rank, but rather because of physical characteristics, like being small, thin, agile and instinctivly wary and alert.
While leading from the front can take many forms I don't think officers were tunnel rat material no matter what their stature.
BTTT
This article is somewhat troubling as it leaves out the fact that so many of VVAW members were frauds. Also, as I understand, the atrocities were, by and large, unverified and unverifiable.
Based on my personal experience, Kerry received his Honorable Discharge under the standard process, which obtains for naval officers transitioning through the Reserve process.
kabar's statement does not include a "probably" or a "possibly," which means that he makes the appearance of asserting instead of making an estimate ... but, let us say that his is making an estimate.
He may be correct in his estimate, but the odds are very strong, that Lt. Kerry's route to the point at which the tradition voluntary and/or involuntary processes began for both officers, to certificate of Honorable Discharge, was NOT the path taken by kabar's career.
kabar has difficulty fathoming that probability.
The odds are very high that Lt. Kerry's career (again, his records and activities) were subject to more than one investigation and/or administrative review for cause, that being, again, Lt. Kerry's associations with the avowed enemies of the United States.
Given that probability, the issue is not really so much that Lt. Kerry was at some time between 1972 and 1978 given a certificate of less than Honorable Discharge, but, that Lt. Kerry was the subject of some kinds of investigation that placed his status in a lesser light than kabar's. So much so, that Lt. Kerry was effectively in some "pool" wherein were other officers who may have had various colored wartime and post-active duty transgressions in varying levels of not serious to very serious.
For which probability, there is much speculation but almost no documents that have yet come to light.
Kerry will never sign Form 180, and there seems to be no mechanism for forcing the release of Kerry's records due to national security concerns.
Another solution. Since so many Bush followers are falsely critical of Kerry. Have Bush enact a presidential order to wave the Form 180 request. It will show that he is ready to help Kerry set the record straight on how wonderful Kerry's record is. ((Sarcasm Off))
Johnson used a Press Release service which, for a fee, sends your Press Release all around the country. That particular Yahoo news page posts just about any and every Press Release it receives. The service is listed at the bottom of the press release. It is Send2Press a subsidiary of Neotrope.
Also, Mr. Johnson has been a guest on the tin foil hat, UFO and ghost story-filled Coast to Coast AM radio show.
Keep digging. This one is starting to smell a bit.
I'd believe something aired on C2C a lot quicker than Dan Rather.
Doug Brinkley, who was out defending Kerry and chopping up the Stolen Honor guys on O'Reilly last night, should read this letter.
As I Google, despite some questions I have, his story is starting to check out.
Yep, now we have VVAW for Truth? Pretty ironic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.