[AmarilloMorning]

You know where I think we're headed? To an abortion Oct Surprise with Bush. If in fact there is fire behind the smoke on that rumor, Kerry and his hacks will absolutely uncover it.

[COEXERJ145]

They tried it 2000 and couldn't come up with anything. Larry Flynt has been pushing it for over four years and still hasn't found any proof. That dog won't bark.

[sinkspur]

You know where I think we're headed? To an abortion Oct Surprise with Bush. If in fact there is fire behind the smoke on that rumor, Kerry and his hacks will absolutely uncover it.

Amarillo, I used to drink and post.

It never worked out.

Post, or drink. But don't mix the two.

There is no "Bush abortion" October Surprise. That's a secret that's too big to keep.

[bayourod]

"You know where I think we're headed? To an abortion Oct Surprise with Bush"

Possibly.

The pattern of the DNC & Old Media, especially CBS has been to accuse Bush of whatever Kerry is accused of.

An example is that they responded to the SiftVets' ads by attacking Bush's National Guard service.

So look for them to accuse Bush of being a sinner. Could be the old rumor that he gave a woman a ride to an abortion clinic or maybe claiming that his killing of civilians in Iraq condemns him to hell. But it will definitely be some religious attack.

[supercat]

You know where I think we're headed? To an abortion Oct Surprise with Bush. If in fact there is fire behind the smoke on that rumor, Kerry and his hacks will absolutely uncover it.

Even supposing that Bush were involved with an abortion sometime in his past, could he not point to his life since he was born again in Christ and remind people that Christ came to cleanse people of their sins?

One thing Democrats don't understand is that almost all "surprises" from the past can be dealt with quickly and easily with a simple haiku:

Yes I did that once.
'Twas incredibly stupid.
I am wiser now.

Of course, one has to be able to show by one's actions since performing the action in question that one has learned from it, but I think almost anything Bush could possibly have in his past could be dealt with this way.

Kerry, by contrast, refuses to repudiate his past actions even when people widely recognize them to have been heinously wrong. If Kerry hadn't been running on his war record, and had admitted his anti-war actions in the past were stupid, he might be able to put even a dishonrable discharge behind him in the eyes of most voters. But he continues to maintain that his VVAW actions were right and proper. So he can't make them go away.

[PROUDAMREP]

Only since 10-15-04? Just sign up to pass this little tidbit on, did you?

You guys just don't give up on the garbage. However, I do know that the evil campaign tactics of the dims will create dirt and lies even if there is none. Just where is the smoke? In Kerry's campaign strategy meetings?

Kerry is despised because of who he is. Bush is despised because he closed down the DC Hilton and doesn't like to party with the elite.

If Kerry wins, the country loses.