Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: asgardshill
I've seen the alleged "transcripts" of these tapes. And still question how far she's going to get with them. All that needs to be asked is "Why didn't you just hang up?"

The answer is obvious: she was "setting him up".
More immediately to the point, unless she told him she was recording the conversations, they are illegal and inadmissible in court.

96 posted on 10/18/2004 6:10:29 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961

More immediately to the point, unless she told him she was recording the conversations, they are illegal and inadmissible in court.""

I believe in New York, only ONE person in the conversation taping must be aware of the taping going on. Therefore, the evidence would be admissable. Some other states have the statute.


118 posted on 10/18/2004 7:06:22 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Publius6961

Quote: More immediately to the point, unless she told him she was recording the conversations, they are illegal and inadmissible in court.


I've seen this thought posted on several occasions. The laws governing the taping of phone conversations vary from state to state. For instance - in Texas (where I live) she would not have violated any law. Does anybody know what the law of New York says of such behavior?


124 posted on 10/18/2004 7:38:00 AM PDT by boedark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson