FYI, O'Reilly WANTS the tapes played, if they exist. It's his contention that they will prove that Mackris instigated the conversation(s) that she is now alleging are harassment.
In addition, her boss at CNN (where she worked between jobs at Fox) was fired for sexual harassment. What does that tell you?
It tells me that she was hoping for a payoff at O'Reilly's expense, didn't want to work for her money, and thought the mere accusation would bring him down or make him pay hush money.
I don't care much for O'Reilly, but I don't think it's gonna work.
However, if you feel a married man having an affair with a subordinate is a respectable thing to do, I am sure Bill Clinton will be relieved.
"In addition, her boss at CNN (where she worked between jobs at Fox) was fired for sexual harassment. What does that tell you? "
This is very interesting. Is she a professional agitator of some kind?
If this is true; what was Bill thinking or not? What a shame because his mystery book is terrific.
I used to listen to O'Reilly's radio show. One of his co-hosts is Lis Weihl. After the Janet Jackson episode at the Superbowl, he asked Lis repeatedly to take off her blouse. He also told her he liked watching lesbians make out.
O'Reilly was always telling Lis that she's a pinhead, but beautiful, and she giggled at that and other comments. I wondered if O'Reilly would get in trouble with his wife for being too friendly to Lis. Finally, I got bored with the show and stopped listening.
IMO, O'Reilly has a loose tongue and has gotten away with saying whatever he wants to young women. It looks like a young woman who's out for BIG BUCKS has called him on it. It had to happen sooner or later in these days of of big-money lawsuits. If she didn't tape him, she won't collect.