Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pete anderson
However, if you feel a married man having an affair with a subordinate is a respectable thing to do, I am sure Bill Clinton will be relieved.

Listen, smarty-pants, her allegation is that he FORCED her to have phone sex. The last time I checked, phones can be hung up. She never alleged an affair. You MIGHT want to look up the facts.

14 posted on 10/18/2004 2:07:44 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne
It does not matter if they were having an affair or if either one of them instigated the phone sex. The bottom line is that he is married and by doing any one of the above he has violated not only the vows he made to his wife but also the trust he has built with his audience.
15 posted on 10/18/2004 2:10:42 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Judith Anne

"Forced" phone sex sounds ridiculous..However, if you have a good job and your boss is hinting that your job is in jeopardy if you do not cooperate, you might reason that anything short of outright physical assault is manageable. I agree with the postings here that believe this is mostly about money, though I do think O'Riley did talk dirty to her, on the phone or otherwise because for months I have perceived his "exciteability" around attractive female hosts and guests. What a terrible shame. It is not at all unusual, though, that "narcississtic" types (aggressive because they think no one should question or disagree with them) who are nationally visible will step over the line regarding their own "entitlement" and will fall hard. We were fiercely devoted to O'Riley for a long time, because we thought he was bringing into the public conscience many issues which needed to become visible to the American people. However, in recent months, we have noticed a drastic change in the values we thought he held. Perhaps he decided to take a number of liberal stances because liberals generally do not place boundaries around sexual aggression. I hope these perceptions are wrong and all of us have to "eat crow."


62 posted on 10/18/2004 4:25:39 AM PDT by jazzlite (esat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson