Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I want my life back! (O'Reilly Accuser)
New York Daily News ^ | 10/18/04 | ALISON GENDAR and NANCY DILLON

Posted on 10/18/2004 1:37:23 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 10/18/2004 2:53:02 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

The woman accusing Fox News host Bill O'Reilly of sexual harassment wants her life and career back, she told the Daily News yesterday.

Fox News officials ordered "The O'Reilly Factor" associate producer Andrea Mackris to stay out of the office as they moved to fire her.

Mackris said yesterday she is determined to stay in journalism even as her life has been upended.

"I love being a journalist. I never expected my life to take this acute left turn," she told The News yesterday.

Mackris, 33, has not set foot in Fox News since she sued the network's star commentator on Wednesday, alleging a string of "vile and degrading" sexual advances.

She said the scandal is an unwelcome detour that has disrupted her life and career.

"Fox told her not to come in," her lawyer David Ratner confirmed. "She hasn't been in since we started meeting with Fox."

Mackris did collect her regular paycheck on Thursday, sources said, but Fox has asked a judge to clear the way for her termination.

"We have asked the court to consider whether the allegations made public by Ms. Mackris are valid," said Fox spokeswoman Irena Briganti. "We have also asked the court to advise Fox News about the possible termination of Ms. Mackris' employment. Ms. Mackris is still employed by and on the payroll of Fox News."

In an explicit lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Mackris claims that O'Reilly subjected her to phone sex against her wishes on three separate occasions in August and September.

She also contends O'Reilly previously told her to use a vibrator "to blow off steam," described his "amazing" endowment and recounted dalliances at a sex show in Thailand.

O'Reilly, 55, a married father of two, has teamed with Fox to file his own suit in Nassau County. He accuses Mackris and her lawyers of a politically motivated scheme to extort $60 million in "blood money."

He called Wednesday "the worst day of my life."

Mackris and her attorneys later updated their suit to charge that O'Reilly's Nassau complaint amounts to illegal retaliation.

"My logic in not going through the quote-unquote proper channels of Fox News' legal and Human Resources departments has been borne out in the retaliatory actions toward me since I came forward," Mackris said yesterday.

O'Reilly's wife, Maureen, meanwhile, kept mum yesterday as she pulled out of the family's Long Island driveway. "This is a private road," she said.

O'Reilly has hired private security to sit in front of his tony Plandome home. "He doesn't want anyone on his property," a silver-haired guard said.

Originally published on October 18, 2004



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: asgardshill
The alleged calls in the O'Reilly case were placed during normal working hours.

Okay you got me!

Right after lunch you need to call a co-worker and tell them about your fantasies while you pleasure yourself.

21 posted on 10/18/2004 2:15:51 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Anybody in this thread give a damn about innocent until . . .?


22 posted on 10/18/2004 2:16:51 AM PDT by Beckwith (John Kerry, sign the Form 180 - petition at http://www.SignForm180.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson
Right after lunch you need to call a co-worker and tell them about your fantasies while you pleasure yourself.

Abuse pressed.

23 posted on 10/18/2004 2:17:29 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson
O'Reilly was using a "battery operated toy"?!?

Now I'm *really* confused....:-P

24 posted on 10/18/2004 2:17:46 AM PDT by Salamander (Pirates of the Appalachians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
Bottom line is that O'Reilly having abandoned the Conservative Movement is not worthy of your defense.
25 posted on 10/18/2004 2:17:56 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill

Thanks.


26 posted on 10/18/2004 2:18:42 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
Gee Thanks.

I simply refuted your argument by providing a parallel example and you hit abuse?

Perhaps you should sharpen your debating skills before running to a Mod.

27 posted on 10/18/2004 2:20:31 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson
It does not matter if they were having an affair or if either one of them instigated the phone sex.

Of course it matters. She can't sue for phone sex if she instigated it.

28 posted on 10/18/2004 2:20:32 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson
Bottom line is that O'Reilly having abandoned the Conservative Movement is not worthy of your defense.

If that is your way of apologizing for attempting to induce me to conduct telephone harassment and intimating that I engage in phone sex, I spit on it. Posts like the one you posted that I reported to the mods do not belong on Freerepublic.

29 posted on 10/18/2004 2:20:54 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Read the Complaint of Smoking Gun. Vivid details of Mr. O'Reilly's alleged behavior.
30 posted on 10/18/2004 2:22:11 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: asgardshill
Well actually people who are unable to defend their arguments do not belong on FR. And if you are so week you a susceptible to being "induced" to do something you do not want to do you have much larger problems than not being able to defend a simple argument.
31 posted on 10/18/2004 2:25:14 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson; Admin Moderator

Do not post to me or Freepmail me again.


32 posted on 10/18/2004 2:26:53 AM PDT by asgardshill (Got a lump of coal? Tell Mary Mapes to 'shove it' - in 2 weeks you'll have a diamond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
I have never said that the plaintiff had a case but have only observed that such behavior is unacceptable for a married man.
33 posted on 10/18/2004 2:27:26 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

Must I?
I'm not a BOR fan and reading his alleged "dirty talk" would ruin my appetite permanently.


34 posted on 10/18/2004 2:27:39 AM PDT by Salamander (Pirates of the Appalachians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson

I agree with asgardshill. You are WAY over the line, and apparently think Mr. O'Reilly is fair game because you think he abandoned the right.


35 posted on 10/18/2004 2:27:53 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pete anderson
I have never said that the plaintiff had a case but have only observed that such behavior is unacceptable for a married man.

Baloney. We can all read the thread. You said he was having an affair.

I don't think much of O'Reilly, but I think even less of you.

36 posted on 10/18/2004 2:29:50 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Well, I have never Freepmailed this guy so I am not sure why he does not want me to do it again. However, I will respect his wishes and not post to him as long as I live.
37 posted on 10/18/2004 2:30:30 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
You said he was having an affair. No, Actually what I said was: It does not matter if they were having an affair or if either one of them instigated the phone sex.
38 posted on 10/18/2004 2:33:44 AM PDT by pete anderson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In an explicit lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, Mackris claims that O'Reilly subjected her to phone sex against her wishes on three separate occasions in August and September.

If Mackris did indeed take the time to tape record the "phone sex" conversations with O'Reilly, how can she claim that she was subjected to it against her will? Did O'Reilly or somebody else prevent her from hanging up the phone?

39 posted on 10/18/2004 2:35:45 AM PDT by judgeandjury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

Actually I think the whole thing is rather suspect.
[insert "I question the timing" here]
First of all, I don't BOR is that stupid.
Second, since he's more or less the "face" of FoxNews, I worry more about this being a backdoor attempt at bringing down the station.
I'm sure PMSNBCNN are severely stung over the fact that Fox outrates them all, combined.
Would they pull a stunt like this to regain their ratings?
Would Dems do such a thing?
I think they would.

If he's guilty of it, I'm enraged because he violated the trust of his wife and kids *and* he besmirches the reputation of Fox.
If he's not, I can only hope somebody will expose this for whatever "conspiracy" it may be.



40 posted on 10/18/2004 2:36:13 AM PDT by Salamander (Pirates of the Appalachians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson