Posted on 10/18/2004 1:27:13 AM PDT by kattracks
[snip]But does the DNC really want to open a can of worms over what can be aired under the guise of news?
After all, many news groups surely would fail such a test, their news coverage rendered no more than "in-kind" contributions to their favored candidates.
* Last month, CBS News ran a report claiming that President Bush shirked his Air National Guard duty, relying in large part on documents that were later revealed to be almost certainly forged.
* This month, ABC News political director Mark Halperin virtually ordered his staff to take a pro-Kerry tilt in their reporting. "We have a responsibility to hold both sides accountable . . . but that doesn't mean we reflexively and artificially hold both sides 'equally' accountable . . . " Halperin wrote in a staff memo.
* Last week, Robert Redford's Sundance Channel dedicated 51/2 hours to a "Vote for Change" concert featuring, among others, Bush-hater Bruce Springsteen. The channel also carries anti-Bush Al Franken's Air America radio show every weeknight.
And that just scratches the surface.
Are those broadcasts illegal? Should the traditionally left-leaning media get a pass on attempts to aid the Kerry-Edwards ticket because they're engaging in a more subtle form of agenda-pushing than Sinclair?
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Thanks for the post. :)) BUMP
Hypocrites.
No complaints from the speech 'god' McCain, save one, Swift Boats Vets not equal enough to speak.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.