Posted on 10/17/2004 2:43:07 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH deserves re-election on Nov. 2 for many reasons, the most important being the need for his continued leadership in the global fight against Islamist terrorism.
In response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, President Bush did not lash out or rush to war. He built an international coalition to destroy the Taliban, then built another to remove Saddam Hussein from power if Hussein continued to defy United Nations resolutions demanding that he adhere to the terms of the cease fire that ended the 1991 Gulf War.
Hussein refused to comply with the ceasefire and subsequent resolutions. Given this and the multifaceted threat that numerous international intelligence agencies believed Hussein posed, President Bush convinced more than 30 other nations to join the United States in destroying the Hussein regime.
President Bushs doctrine of pre-emption was an insightful and needed change in American foreign policy after Sept. 11, but his opponent does not believe in it. Resumption of a pre-9/11 mindset in the White House would run the risk of giving cover to terrorists and rogue regimes who seek to aid each other in a war against Western civilization. This is not a risk we want to see America take.
Domestically, President Bush has been disappointing in some areas. He has spent far too much money, deepened federal involvement in education and acted to limit free speech by signing into law an unconstitutional campaign finance reform bill. Yet his opponent is for spending vastly larger sums, getting the federal government more deeply involved in education and other local and state matters, and further restricting free speech.
While the President loses points on some domestic issues, he scores big on others. He has the right ideas on taxes, Social Security and health insurance. Without President Bushs tax cuts, the economic downturn that began under President Clinton would have lasted longer and been more pronounced. Sen. John Kerry, readers might remember, voted against those tax cuts.
On social issues, the President also wins. John Kerry says he respects pro-life Americans, yet he wants to force them to pay for abortions and embryonic stem cell research. He says he is against same-sex marriage, yet he would do nothing to stop it.
On Nov. 2, we will vote for President Bush without hesitation. As the rest of the region goes for Sen. Kerry on Election Day, we hope Granite Staters will again display their famous independence by voting for President Bush and reminding the rest of the country that New Hampshire remains the most sensible state in New England.
Lando
"Why New Hampshire Will Pick the President":
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1248142/posts
Lando, do you have an opinion on how influential this endorsement will be among New Hampshire voters?
Lando
New Hampshire ping.
Has any newspaper endorsed Bush this year that didn't endorse him 2000?
I hope it will help. Bush has been a couple of points behind.
I'm really hoping New Hampshire will remain true to its motto: "Live Free or Die". How depressing if all of New England ends up blue.
I can't answer that, don't really have much idea. Maybe the Washington Post? They endorsed Bush, and I THINK they endorsed Gore in 2000.
When did the WaPo endorse Bush????? Are you sure?
I have a special election day avatar....how about it??
Lando
I don't think they have endorsed anyone yet, but the buzz going around is that they will endorse Bush.
What is your source for The Washington Post endorsing Bush ? I haven't read anything about it !
That's lovely. LOL (Yeah, the Pack looked good!! Too little, too late, I'm afraid...but I still love 'em.)
Absolutely PRECISE Summaries!
I could have sworn that I read that posted on Free Republic, but I can't find it on a search. So maybe I'm just dreaming.
Or maybe it was on my last visit to that alternate universe?
Lando
; )
To All:
"HUSSEIN REFUSED TO COMPLY WITH THE CEASEFIRE AND SUBSEQUENT RESOLUTIONS."
Hussein, on numerous occasions, attacked coalition aircraft and defied the international community by violating seventeen resolutions. We are still fighting the Persian Gulf War and so be it.
THIS IS THE SOLE REASON WE WENT BACK INTO IRAQ! When the very next liberal tells me differently, I'm going to repeat it, and repeat it, and repeat it again and again.
I don't know how many this endorsement will influence, but as a trasplant, it's mighty good to see. BTW, sent my absentee ballot out a few days ago. IMO it's Bush 1; Kerry 0. BUSH WINS NH!!!!!!! hehe
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.