Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorism fears not sufficient reason to search protesters, appellate court rules
AP ^ | 10/16/4 | C.G. WALLACE

Posted on 10/16/2004 11:12:25 AM PDT by SmithL

ATLANTA (AP) --

Fears of a terrorist attack are not sufficient reason for authorities to search people at a protest, a federal appeals court has ruled, saying Sept. 11 "cannot be the day liberty perished."

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously Friday that protesters may not be required to pass through metal detectors when they gather next month for a rally against a U.S. training academy for Latin American soldiers.

Authorities began using the metal detectors at the annual School of the Americas protest after the 2001 terrorist attacks, but the court found that practice to be unconstitutional.

"We cannot simply suspend or restrict civil liberties until the War of Terror is over, because the War on Terror is unlikely ever to be truly over,"

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: judicialactivism; napalminthemorning; removefromthebench; ruling; schooloftheamericas; terror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2004 11:12:25 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Did the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just put a "Kick Me!" sign on the backs of the population?

Prairie


2 posted on 10/16/2004 11:14:51 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Brought to you by The American Democrat Party, also known as Al Qaeda, Western Division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If there is an incident, the 11th will be toast.


3 posted on 10/16/2004 11:15:28 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

what next? I'm really ticked off by this.


4 posted on 10/16/2004 11:16:27 AM PDT by CityOntheHill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They are setting us up for another attack. One day these activist judges will suffer the wrath of the American people.......


5 posted on 10/16/2004 11:17:14 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Liberalism IS a mental disease, thanks to Gramsci, Marcuse and others from the Frankfurt School.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
see, the trouble that I have with this is as follows:

A LOT OF THESE PEOPLE ARE SYMPATHETIC TO THE TERRORISTS.

so how do we solve it? I HAVE A PLAN. elect me to find out!

6 posted on 10/16/2004 11:18:03 AM PDT by Libertarian4Bush (DECISION 2004: IT'S THE SPITBALLS, STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I think metal detector scans are reasonable. But not pat-down searches at this time.
7 posted on 10/16/2004 11:19:20 AM PDT by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Now... there will be for sure. The liberal-demokkkRAT activist judges are part of the Fifth Column™, and definitely a mainstay of The Enemy Within™.


8 posted on 10/16/2004 11:21:04 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian4Bush

"We cannot simply suspend or restrict civil liberties until the War of Terror is over, because the War on Terror is unlikely ever to be truly over,"


and their point is?

So we all walk around in fear of the hate America/pro-Al Qaeda crowd for ever? I guess this is what Second Amendment freedoms are all about.


9 posted on 10/16/2004 11:21:20 AM PDT by CityOntheHill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

The Enemy Within is more dangerous than any terrorist.


10 posted on 10/16/2004 11:22:28 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (Liberalism IS a mental disease, thanks to Gramsci, Marcuse and others from the Frankfurt School.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian4Bush

"I HAVE A PLAN"

So does sKerry:

http://www.asjewelers.com/FRstuff/7/I_have_a_plan.wmv


11 posted on 10/16/2004 11:22:32 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Let me get this straight... Don't the judges meet in a courthouse? And don't most, if not all, courthouses have metal detectors?

So it's OK for the judges to be protected with metal detectors, but not anybody else?


12 posted on 10/16/2004 11:23:23 AM PDT by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The 11th NEEDS to be toast.


13 posted on 10/16/2004 11:23:44 AM PDT by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

hilarious.


14 posted on 10/16/2004 11:23:50 AM PDT by CityOntheHill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

You are soooooooooo right, SD!

But sKerry has a plan!

http://www.asjewelers.com/FRstuff/7/I_have_a_plan.wmv


15 posted on 10/16/2004 11:23:57 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Brilliant

I agree with you.

Are these guys appointed or voted in? And who is paying their salaries?


18 posted on 10/16/2004 11:27:08 AM PDT by focusandclarity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is insane.

Can 11th Circuit Court of Appeals be sued?


19 posted on 10/16/2004 11:27:40 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (The 11th Circuit is not interpreting law; it's trying to make it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
City officials in Columbus, Ga., contended the searches were needed because of the elevated risk of terrorism, but the court threw out that argument, saying it would "eviscerate the Fourth Amendment."
I wonder, does the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals have a metal detector in their building? Does this mean that my county courthouse has to take out their metal detectors?
20 posted on 10/16/2004 11:27:43 AM PDT by lifacs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson