"Definitely worse than Sleaseball #42; and that's saying something."
Indeed. Clinton was happier and more open about his scoundrel nature. After all, he was probably born that way.
Now don't flame me but,,,Clinton and Kerry are horses of different colors. Clinton, hate him if we like, was genuine, a genuine con artist. He could do or say anything to win a vote and was unapologetic about who he was.
Kerry is different. He is an empty man in a way who aspires to be better than he is. So he prevaricates to himself, he believes his lies. He deep down knows he is a poseur and is shamed of it.
Clinton is a happy man, a happy con artist, and Kerry is a sad human being full of bloated ego. I do believe Clinton had transcended his ego.
Maybe I am not clear, but I am struggling to define Kerry, lately he is fascinating me as I can see the sadness in him.