Posted on 10/16/2004 1:20:38 AM PDT by familyop
>>>> In my mind, here is rock-solid proof that this lawsuit is part of the liberal agenda.
Very true. The guy even mentioned the President in the complaint, which is bizarre and completely unjustifiable. But it seems like they do have the goods on old BOR. This isn't like the nutjobs who sue the President from time to time.
Yes, and the news opinion entertainment and playboy-playgirl social anarchist brainwashing industry (AKA, the mainstream media) is advocating for itself, its orgy, and so forth. It's them against the seductive shrew for poor, innocent Bill O'Reilly. It's about their management power and money against their tattle-tale employees. The latest kind of headline we're seeing in most of their publications now is, "Fox moves to fire accuser" (New York Daily News).
IMO, there are no good guys or conservatives involved in the whole thing. They can harp and harp about Mr. Bill being a "right wing" "conservative" all they want, but none of their political, voting viewers, listeners and readers are that stupid. Even intuition tells consumers that there's something wrong with that boyo.
It's a Democrat internal fight right where we want it to be: on their time and money and in the mainstream media. During otherwise idle moments, throw more fire into it. Give the mainstream Democrat media that to do, and don't accept the usual kinds of slander against our efforts from them until Election Day.
From the mainstream media, we want more about Bill! ...Bill, Bill, Bill! He is the left/liberal mind on display, and everyone knows it.
We know what frankenMonkey meant. From now on, "democracy" from any Republican means "representative republic"--our right wing conspiracy "code" words. Have a look at frankenMonkey's exposure of Soros' dirt--good info to keep track of and publish about. It characterizes the opposition.
So, if this connection were to be proof, you need to make the connection that the lawyers appraoched Macklis and not the other way around. Is there anyway we could find out if Macklis has/had a personal relationship with anyone from that law firm? Do you understand what I'm saying?
yep. gotta remember it's a democratic republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.