Posted on 10/15/2004 3:08:06 PM PDT by swilhelm73
MRC's Brent Baker reports that the media elite typically disliked the L word last night. Newsweek Managing Editor Jon Meacham contended on MSNBC before the debate that the liberal tag "seems a little tinny these days. I think it's a more serious time." He argued that if Bush "simply throws red meat out that's trouble." After the debate, Boston Globe reporter Nina Easton complained on CNN that Republican have "ridden that tired horse of calling Kerry a liberal from Massachusetts and out of the mainstream, which doesn't, I don't think, play that well to swing voters."
While it's true that merely using the word "liberal" might seem a bit old, it might play well with swing voters if Bush can explain what the L word means: higher taxes, more government bureaucracy, lowered defense spending, seeing the leading foreign policy crisis as the lack of arms control and global warming agreements....
PS: Karl Rove must consider it a great strategic success that Kerry hasn't really been suggesting too hard that Bush is too conservative, something the media love saying about Republicans.
Thanks for the ping!
The real Southie 'rats hate liberals -- the yuppies are another story: the few I have the misfortune to know are utterly uninformed and apolitical, except for a reflexive MSM Zeitgeist preference for dems.
But I am not seeing presidential race bumper stickers here at all; well, I've seen five all told -- two pro-Kerry, one pro-Bush, one Vets against Kerry and one Another Firefighter against Kerry. Lots and lots of flag stickers and Support our Troops stickers (the real Southie also has a high proportion of veterans).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.