Just to clarify, aren't you really suggesting that the 'whole "tax cuts for the rich" argument' is actually the 'let's tax the rich' argument? What I mean is, the dims are arguing for a 'let's soak the rich' approach to taxes, while the replublicans are arguing for reduced taxes for the upper bracket taxpayers, the reason being that these are the folks who create jobs by investing their capital in entrepreneurism. Still, I know what you mean. I think.
No no. I, unlike my Dem "counterparts" (if the imbeciles can even be called that) don't buy the propaganda and simple-minded approach to tax cuts. "Tax cuts for the rich" is as ridiculous as the meaning of "is."