Skip to comments.
Boy, 13, faces child porn charges
Tacoma News Tribune ^
| 10152004
| Stacey Mulick
Posted on 10/15/2004 2:11:47 PM PDT by Horatio Gates
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
It is also very unusual for these types of things to happen when you have parents that are actually involved with their kids and care about what they're doing.
To: shotokan
If these moron charge a child for child porn for posting a picture of himself, they should be thrown out of office immediately.
2
posted on
10/15/2004 2:14:05 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: JLS
..what would Beavis and Butthead say? :P
3
posted on
10/15/2004 2:17:52 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: JLS
4
posted on
10/15/2004 2:24:06 PM PDT
by
Jaded
((Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society. - Mark Twain))
To: JLS
If these moron charge a child for child porn for posting a picture of himself, they should be thrown out of office immediately.You might consider reading the story before commenting:
Law enforcement authorities within the United States and in other countries have identified 11 of the children in the images
5
posted on
10/15/2004 2:37:18 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: PAR35
He is 13. He might have a limited at best understanding of sexuality. Yet you think stimatizing him as a sexual criminal for the rest of his life is an appropriate use of government authority?
6
posted on
10/15/2004 2:41:29 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: JLS
You really think a 13-year-old boy doesn't know from sexuality? He might not be aware of its power or ramifications, but he knows it's there, all right.
7
posted on
10/15/2004 2:42:47 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(Chain mail is a privilege, not a right.)
To: shotokan
Phillip Roth's "Portnoy" discovered a computer? Why complain?
8
posted on
10/15/2004 2:44:43 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
To: Xenalyte
Do you know what the word "limited" means?
9
posted on
10/15/2004 2:44:49 PM PDT
by
JLS
To: JLS
He is 13. He might have a limited at best understanding of sexuality. Yet you think stimatizing him as a sexual criminal for the rest of his life is an appropriate use of government authority?He's a rapist waiting to happen. What do you suggest?
10
posted on
10/15/2004 2:45:10 PM PDT
by
Fatalis
(The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
To: JLS
Catch the mote before it becomes a log.
11
posted on
10/15/2004 2:45:51 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
To: JLS
Yes...and a scarlet tatoo between his eyes would help too.
To: Fatalis
Surely you can't be serious?
13
posted on
10/15/2004 2:47:18 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
To: JLS
Yet you think stimatizing him as a sexual criminal for the rest of his life is an appropriate use of government authority? Save your specious arguments for someone with less knowledge. The kid will go through the juvenile justice system (where he will be adjudicated, not convicted) and his record will be sealed if he behaves himself in the future. So, he won't be "stigmatized" as a criminal because he won't have a criminal conviction.
14
posted on
10/15/2004 2:50:16 PM PDT
by
PAR35
To: shotokan
Well, as with Columbine, parents who are detached can possibly find themselves with a problem like this on their hands -- but what do you want to bet this lad has been the subject of some sexual abuse that he himself did not instigate.
15
posted on
10/15/2004 2:51:42 PM PDT
by
The Red Zone
(The reason they're trying to starve her isn't because she's dying, but because she isn't. [Supercat])
To: Old Professer
Sure I am. What do you suggest, a wrist slap and hope for the best?
16
posted on
10/15/2004 2:53:21 PM PDT
by
Fatalis
(The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
To: Fatalis
Have you seen the pictures in question?
17
posted on
10/15/2004 2:55:19 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Fear is the fountain of hostility.)
To: Fatalis
Something else could be egging on this "Portnoy," some adults who ARE crooks. That needs intervention pronto.
18
posted on
10/15/2004 2:55:28 PM PDT
by
The Red Zone
(The reason they're trying to starve her isn't because she's dying, but because she isn't. [Supercat])
To: Xenalyte
You really think a 13-year-old boy doesn't know from sexuality? He might not be aware of its power or ramifications, but he knows it's there, all right.Oh no, I'm sure he had no idea that child porn was illegal.
The kid's a perv, and definitely knows it.
19
posted on
10/15/2004 2:56:43 PM PDT
by
Fatalis
(The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
To: Old Professer
Have you seen the pictures in question?I've seen stupid questions.
Of course I haven't seen the 180 pics of child porn this kid is alleged to have distributed with at least 11 different children depicted. How about you?
20
posted on
10/15/2004 3:00:13 PM PDT
by
Fatalis
(The Libertarian Party is to politics as Esperanto is to linguistics.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson