Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Community Planning Case Study: Corralitos, California
Advance Bulletin ^ | Oct 13, 2004 | Susanna Lynton Jennings

Posted on 10/15/2004 9:36:13 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Corralitos in danger!
1 posted on 10/15/2004 9:36:14 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freebilly; martin_fierro; EggsAckley; Carry_Okie; The Other Harry; cake_crumb; Seadog Bytes; ...

Santa Cruz CA PING


2 posted on 10/15/2004 9:37:41 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

"Each of these elements forces a monotonous uniformity..."

They tried this somewhere else and it didn't work....ummmm...yeah, that's right, the USSR!


3 posted on 10/15/2004 9:42:10 AM PDT by baltodog (This space for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baltodog
They tried this somewhere else and it didn't work....ummmm...yeah, that's right, the USSR!

You've won the contest on the first try! Congratulations.
4 posted on 10/15/2004 9:45:48 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: take; Fiddlstix; Wonder Warthog; christie; PersonalLiberties; dasboot; Spann_Tillman; Mr. Mojo; ...

Sustainable development PING


5 posted on 10/15/2004 9:48:04 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th; TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig; BenLurkin; brooklin; tacticalogic; mabelkitty; drhogan; ...

Community planning FYI


6 posted on 10/15/2004 9:49:30 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Thanks for the ping hedge!! I had no idea this was going on. This is terrible. Corralitos is one of the most interesting villages around here.

So, does this mean that Corralitos Market won't "fit in?"

Geeze this stuff is scary.


7 posted on 10/15/2004 10:05:01 AM PDT by EggsAckley (............so many vanities............................so little bandwidth..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

The operative word "NGO".....same old power grab to give UNELECTED PEOPLE power.


8 posted on 10/15/2004 10:06:55 AM PDT by applpie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

The Corralitos market has had to make numerous changes already. I mean to ask Dave if the new paint job was his own design, or if the "planners" had suggestions for him.

They have already had to stripe out at least one of their parking spaces (made it no parking as a result of the anti-car attitude in the county) to suit the planners. I would bet their signs are not considered "harmonious" as well. Even their smokehouse had to be moved, I'm told.


9 posted on 10/15/2004 10:11:21 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Hey, they don't call it "The People's Republic of Santa Cruz" for nothing. Arch-leftist political and cultural dominance has been the norm there for well over a decade and perhaps much longer.


10 posted on 10/15/2004 10:12:29 AM PDT by macbee ("Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

Did you see this article in the Sentinel today?


Santa Cruz residents unload on council candidates at forum

"high-density housing can be done in a quality way."

But not in Santa Cruz!

http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2004/October/15/local/stories/03local.htm


11 posted on 10/15/2004 10:14:28 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Hedge, I just emailed this to Michael Zwerling at KSCO. I strongly suggested that he do a Saturday Special on this. He's done "sustainable development" issues, but not specifically on Corralitos.

I am furious!!


12 posted on 10/15/2004 10:14:40 AM PDT by EggsAckley (............so many vanities............................so little bandwidth..................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: macbee

It appears that some are trying to fight back. God speed to them!


13 posted on 10/15/2004 10:15:12 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley

If you followed the link to the Corralitoscalifornia website you can see part of the plan, they don't have the whole thing posted yet.

Its an incredibly anti-American piece of work if you ask me. I have the whole plan, its 70 pages long-- I hope they get the whole thing up there soon so people can see what these "Planners" really have in mind.

The ch. 7-9 are pretty telling though, with restrictions all over the place on private property and travel.


14 posted on 10/15/2004 10:20:33 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Driveways must be paved with salt rock, engineered gravel, bricks or pavers. Asphalt or other economical materials are prohibited.

Considering the condition of county roads, this is an absolute scream. It will play hell with low-impact siting because people will do what they can to shorten the driveway instead of putting the house in a better place.

BTW, what the hell is a "salt rock" pavement? I googled it and got garbage. Is this another one of Granite Rock's little monopolistic scams similar to the county requirement for a foot of baserock on logging roads?

15 posted on 10/15/2004 10:28:35 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Three choices: Defeat Islam, submit, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
BTW, what the hell is a "salt rock" pavement?
16 posted on 10/15/2004 10:33:27 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Missed a bracket.

I have no idea what sal rock pavement is. You may be right its a boondoggle. As for the low-impact siting, these guys never consider their little totalitarian ideas might have consequences that make things worse. But every idea in their plan makes life here worse.


17 posted on 10/15/2004 10:34:22 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

RE: "Some commercial facilities have design features that are not in harmony with the Corralitos community."

Here in them thar Belmont hills we have the same bunch of BS going on. Starting in the early 90s, a cabal of carpet bagger, wealthy, Lefty, aging hippies became a majority at the council. First they massively reduced all slope density formulas and banned outright any development in certain areas. Then they started up a design review board. Finally came the visioning sessions. Naturally, such sessions are well attended by leisure oriented people who don't work very much and just happen to be the main support group for the elites.

Also, not surprisingly, their ideas of "compatible designs" are pure New England and they hate the native Southwestern styles of California. There is a strip mall along El Camino that they have a hair up their butts about because it's a red tile roof stucco walled job and does not fit in with the clap board, cedar shingled wall looks that they are after.

On a somewhat related note a few weeks ago I was sitting in a coffee shop in nearby San Carlos and could not help overhearing a couple of old hippie Marxist civic activist types as they conversed. They were overtly planning out their positions for an upcoming planning commission meeting. They explicitly stated that they wanted to crank down on square footage limits and, get this, specifically micromanage things like the number of bedrooms and bathrooms per home, in order to promote childless couples and gays to move in. I'm not making this up, they said it and I heard it.

TAKE BACK CALIFORNIA!


18 posted on 10/15/2004 10:36:10 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Yikes! Corralitos is in my ZIP code. Better ping for later.


19 posted on 10/15/2004 10:39:09 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson (Ho, Ho, Ho Chi Minh/Loves John Kerry so vote him in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
They explicitly stated that they wanted to crank down on square footage limits and, get this, specifically micromanage things like the number of bedrooms and bathrooms per home, in order to promote childless couples and gays to move in

I have heard this kind of talk by our planners in Santa Cruz county at planning department meetings! They will restrict residency of government funded complexes to named income levels and occupations and whether a person is single or elderly.

This is such an affront to a once free people that we have soviet commissions directing tax money to projects that destroy the free market for housing. It really burns me up!
20 posted on 10/15/2004 10:41:13 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson