Posted on 10/15/2004 9:15:23 AM PDT by RightWhale
Representatives of Bush, Kerry Debate Space
By Colin Clark Space News Staff Writer
posted: 15 October 2004 11:44 am ET
WASHINGTON -- It may not have had the global audience of the last Bush-Kerry debate, but about 100 members of the civil space community watched with rapt attention as representatives of the two campaigns conducted a spirited debate Oct. 14 about the future of space between representatives of the two campaigns. Former NASA associate administrator for policy and plans, Lori Garver, represented Sen. John Kerry. Frank Sietzen, an aerospace journalist, represented President George Bush.
Kerry would adopt “a strong and balanced” approach between space exploration and other NASA missions, Garver told the gathering, sponsored by Women in Aerospace and the Washington Space Business Roundtable. Exploration, she said later in the debate, would be “but one goal among many.”
A Bush victory would offer “an unprecedented opportunity for change and new opportunities in space,” Sietzen said, stressing the Bush goal of returning to the moon by 2020 and planning a mission to Mars. Much of the debate between Garver and Sietzen centered on the question of whether the vision for human and robotic space exploration outlined by Bush in January should dominate NASA’s future. NASA faces “a huge risk we can lose what we have now if we do this one thing,” Garver argued. A Kerry administration, instead, would “probably” boost research and development funding at NASA.
Sietzen told the audience that the United States needs “to go to the moon right now,” and should embrace Bush’s vision of exploration.
Garver decried what she called “the most partisan NASA in history” under Bush, accusing the administration of drawing up its exploration plans in secret without consulting Democrats. Kerry would, she added “work to depoliticize space.” If elected, Kerry’s first acts on space would be to appoint leaders at NASA to “restore the public’s confidence and (the agency’s) credibility,” she said. Sietzen replied that NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe, had excellent access to the White House, meeting with the president or vice president almost every other day.
To improve what she said was “a low point in our cooperative ventures in space,” Kerry would strive to work more closely with international partners, making sure they were included in deliberations, Garver said. She specifically criticized Bush for not consulting with the International Space Station partners as the new vision for NASA was being formulated throughout 2003. Sietzen countered, claiming “70 discussions were underway around the world.”
Does Kerry have a plan for Space?
How much can we really spend on space when nobody cares?
Of course, saying you don't care about space is like saying you don't care about the future, but that's the way it is.
That is exactly it. There is no constituency because there are no private property rights.
There where no private property rights during the Apollo era, when space exploration was fully funded. I agree with you in principal, but we need vision even more, and visionary missions.
An engineering problem. There are plenty of the materials to make air out there, and there is a lot of water in the solar system.
As to property rights, no major investment institution can invest without collateral, there is no collateral, so there will be no major private investment. Deduction, no stronger argument. It's in the President's Committee Report.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.