Replies

You assume annulments are "unbiblical" because they do not appear in the Bible, yet the Protestant faith was born out of the "unbiblical" Reformation. Christianity obviously believes slavery is wrong, but there is nothing "biblical" to support this. There is also nothing "biblical" about embryonic stem cells or abortion, yet they are cause celebres in many sect of Christianity. By your reasoning, none of the above positions are valid and are illogical since they are not "biblical". Faith is formed not only in word (specifically 'The Word') but in reason as well. Reason dictated abortion as an evil not because it says so in the Bible but because abortion was considered a secular evil even before Christianity, and was reasoned to be an outgrowth of "Thou shalt not kill" and Isaiah's declaration of God having "knitted him in the womb." Jesus was downright biblically indifferent to slavery (except for spiritual slavery to sin), yet no one would dare believe that He would find human ownership as acceptable to God.

Let's not forget the entirely "otherly-Gospel-like" Catholic Crusades which only managed to spare the entire continent of Europe from being under the thumb of Sharia since the 11th century. Better yet, the un-acceptance (followed by the acceptance) of Galileo's theory of the sun as the center of the universe which, as most Catholic-haters would like to say, is proof that the Church is bad, yet cannot state on what Biblical grounds they would speak differently of Galileo's theory at that point in time.

Without Reason, you've put God in a lockbox. Thomas Aquinas wrote his masterpiece on the Catholic faith based on a combination of scripture and reason. When someone makes a stupid, imbecilic comment like "[Catholicism] is illogical and from another Gospel", I guarantee you someone like me is going to come along and set them straight.

The reasoning behind anullment is that a marital commitment did not exist when the vows were made. I could be a philandering bisexual who can father ten kids in the next twenty years, and at the same time regard my wife as a spiritually unequal piece of meat, separate in God's eyes instead of united as a reflection of Christ's union with the Church. I could be a bigamist. I could marry with the unspoken intent of divorcing my wife when I hit my middle-age crisis. I could marry without intending to be faithful. I could pretend to believe in Christ for the sake of participating in a family-sponsored wedding, have my vows mean nothing when they spill from my lips, and become a Sunday school teacher later in life - but it doesn't make my marriage valid. If there is an ongoing pattern of physical or emotional or verbal abuse, the marriage is stands a good chance of being annulled, with or without kids.

There may not be anything "biblically" chapter-and-verse about annullment but the same can be said for any of the above scenarios with regards to "valid" marriage.