Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Almost as many asexuals as gays, study suggests
AFP ^ | Wed Oct 13

Posted on 10/15/2004 7:31:39 AM PDT by No Surrender Monkey

Around one percent of adults have absolutely no interest in sex, a surprisingly high figure that is not far from the estimated three percent of the population who are gay, according to a study reported in next Saturday's New Scientist.

The analysis looked at responses made among 18,000 people in Britain who were interviewed about their sexual practices.

One percent said they agreed with the statement: "I have never felt sexually attracted to anyone at all."

That study, conducted by Anthony Bogaert, a psychologist and human sexuality expert at Brock University in St. Catherines, Canada, is published in the latest issue of The Journal of Sex Research. The British survey was carried out in 1994 as part of a study into sexual practices.

"If asexuality is indeed a form of sexual orientation, perhaps it will not be long before the issue of 'A' pride starts attracting more attention," New Scientist says.

Plucky activists have already started campaigning to promote awareness and acceptance of asexuality, it reports.

One such group, the Asexual Visibility and Education Network (AVEN) (http://www.asexuality.org/discussion/) has an online store selling T-shirts bearing such slogans as "Asexuality: it's not just for amoebas anymore."

It also sells a thong that reads: "It's only underwear. Get over it."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: asexual
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2004 7:31:39 AM PDT by No Surrender Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey

This is ridiculous.


2 posted on 10/15/2004 7:33:36 AM PDT by RockinRight (John Kerry is the wrong candidate, for the wrong country, at the wrong time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey
One percent said they agreed with the statement: "I have never felt sexually attracted to anyone at all."

Seeing Janet Reno naked at a young age will do that to a person.

3 posted on 10/15/2004 7:33:45 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey

Darwinian evolution at work.


4 posted on 10/15/2004 7:34:07 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey

Great. Now they are going to demand the right to marry themselves.


5 posted on 10/15/2004 7:34:27 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Santorum 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Some are already married, it seems...to their professions....


6 posted on 10/15/2004 7:37:38 AM PDT by Visioneer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
>This is ridiculous

My life as an amoeba

By Zoe O'Reilly
StarNet Dispatches
Fri May 30 02:34:53 MST 1997 [!]

With Ellen's coming out and the new trend towards "outing" and the overall hipness involved, there's been a lot of press dedicated to gays, bisexuals and most other sexually-oriented groups. But there is one group continuously overlooked:

The asexual.

I'm out and proud to be asexual. My people are a definite minority group who wish to be recognized like all the others. We want a colored ribbon, a national holiday, coupons for fast food. We want the world to know that we are out there.

School science books make the barest mention of our kind and even then stick to the single-celled variety. As far as the rest of the world is concerned, asexual organisms with more than one cell don't exist. That makes it quite difficult to come to terms with your lack of sexuality. I'm not one of those people who makes a big deal about abstaining from sex. I don't have the self-righteous air that's required and my spare time isn't spent thinking about how I don't have sex. I just don't bother about the subject at all.

I find that being devoid of sexuality makes my life a lot easier. By not having a significant other I am following Thoreau's philosophy of "simplify, simplify, simplify." One less birthday to remember, less food to buy and no one forcing me to place someone besides myself first on my list. And a perfect reason for it all. Like the scorpion told the fox in the old fable, "It is my nature."

By not participating in that aspect of life, my time is freed for other activities: Building shrines, memorizing Cure lyrics, studying forensic psychology ... whatever I want to do. My conversations with friends are about really important subjects like their latest arrest or financial aid woe. No long, convoluted love tales.

Some might say that we aren't really asexual, we just want to think we are. Remember this quote, "I think, therefore I am." Add a couple words, "I think I'm asexual, therefore I am." ...

7 posted on 10/15/2004 7:38:09 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey

This is mindboggling. I feel the same way about rollercoasters...How could somebody NOT have fun doing it?


8 posted on 10/15/2004 7:42:01 AM PDT by Heavyrunner (Socialize this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss

"Asexuals" are probably gays who can't get a grip.


9 posted on 10/15/2004 7:42:05 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
I love me
I think I'm grand.
I'm going to the movies
just to hold my hand.

Seriously, I do not think it is reasonable to equate asexuality with narcissism. Many asexual people have deep friendships and relationships - and even significant others in their lives...Just no sex....

A narcissist, in contrast, has only self.
10 posted on 10/15/2004 7:45:14 AM PDT by Visioneer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner
>I feel the same way about rollercoasters...How could somebody NOT have fun doing it?


11 posted on 10/15/2004 7:48:41 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner
This is mindboggling. I feel the same way about rollercoasters...How could somebody NOT have fun doing it?

Well, in the Bible (1 Cor 7) the apostle Paul implies a gift of celibacy, which in the context of his teaching can only mean someone who has no real desire for sex. Maybe He gave it to these people for His reasons, none of which may make any sense to us at all.

12 posted on 10/15/2004 7:52:42 AM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey
By not participating in that aspect of life, my time is freed for other activities: Building shrines, memorizing Cure lyrics, studying forensic psychology ... whatever I want to do

I can certainly understand why someone would prefer memorizing Cure lyrics to making mad, passionate love to a significant other.

13 posted on 10/15/2004 7:55:37 AM PDT by SilentServiceCPOWife (No one notices the water until the well runs dry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss


14 posted on 10/15/2004 7:55:47 AM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey
"that is not far from the estimated three percent of the population who are gay,"

These Canadian researchers need to talk to each other to get their facts straight (no pun intended).

In June of just this year, the Canadian Community Health Survey reported "1.3 percent of men considered themselves homosexual compared to 0.7 percent of women."

C'mon guys.

15 posted on 10/15/2004 8:06:11 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kezekiel

I have a good male friend that is 49 years old and is asexual. I've known him for 40 years and I know for fact he is not gay.

He came right out more than once and told my wife and I he has no interest in women even for sex. His thing is hunting and woodworking. That is all he cares about in life.

I know he is happy in life and feels he is not missing out on anything in life.


16 posted on 10/15/2004 8:07:39 AM PDT by superiorslots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kezekiel
"Maybe He gave it to these people for His reasons..."

Yes, just so. After the thread yesterday on this topic and the responses so far on this one, I am still amazed at the "passion" people feel about this topic. As far as I can see, these people cause no harm to themselves or to society.

Creating another sexual (or nonsexual) special interest group is lame, of course, but otherwise there's no controversy here.

17 posted on 10/15/2004 8:10:52 AM PDT by Gingersnap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey

Coming next: Asexual rights movement?


18 posted on 10/15/2004 8:16:17 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er ({about the news media} "We'll tell you any sh** you want hear" : Howard Beale --> NETWORK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots

Hey, we all get there sooner or later. It's kind of a relief, actually.


19 posted on 10/15/2004 8:18:02 AM PDT by MoralSense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: No Surrender Monkey

Personally, I don't think this is a bad thing at all. It'd be kinda neat if this became a "trend" like the homosexual thing did. The homosexual trend oversexualized society... imagine a trend where sexualization became seen as "unhip".

Sounds like just about the thing we need, to be honest.


20 posted on 10/15/2004 8:44:59 AM PDT by MWS (John Kerry- The wrong candidate for the wrong office at the wrong time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson