[Tacis]

I watched Ted last night. O'Neill stayed right on message and answered the questioned but in the context he wanted. Ted tried hard to keep everything to his agenda. It was good to see a "guest" try to keep one of Hanoi's running dogs in line.

O'Neill's last paragraph, above, is fascinating. I have hypothesized this for months and believe there is good circumstantial evidence to support it. But, I haven't found direct evidence. I hope O'Neill will spring what he has in a timely manner and on a good news day. The ultra-left wing media will gladly spend all day on Michael Jackson's hangnail if it meant not covering proof of Viet Cong Kerry's termination from the USNR under other than honorable conditions.

And, of course, in view of Kerry's refusal to be honest with America and release his military records, any ideas why he would do so is fair game. Note an extension, not only is he hiding something so terrible, negative and unAmerican that it's release would cause him to lose the election, it would also require his to resign from the Senate.

[Mike Fieschko]

O'Neill's last paragraph, above, is fascinating. I have hypothesized this for months and believe there is good circumstantial evidence to support it.

Yes, you have, which is of course why I pinged you. Off the top of my head, I wanted you to see this and see my offer.

O'Neil and the Swifties have so far been very disciplined about their charges, limiting their charges to eyewitness accounts or documents.

I doubt O'Neil would abandon that discipline at this time.