Anyone who wants to glance at the title and then post something clever and original like:
1. Bush did it;
2. Daschle is deeply sadened;
3. A full-screen Star Trek pic;
is certainly free to do so, but please address your post to someone other than me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..
Science list Ping! This is an elite subset of the Evolution list.
See the list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail me to be added or dropped.
2 posted on
10/14/2004 1:15:48 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
#3![](http://www.motorpsychorealms.org.uk/spacedout/ss1701a.jpg)
3 posted on
10/14/2004 1:22:32 PM PDT by
bondserv
(Alignment is critical! †)
To: PatrickHenry
Any risk to people caught in a beam? What if one of these things becomes misaligned? Arcturus here we come?
To: Thrusher
Please, Lord, oh please give me the strength to resist the temptation.
5 posted on
10/14/2004 1:24:08 PM PDT by
Thrusher
(Laffer curve: decreasing tax rates increases tax revenue.)
To: KevinDavis
6 posted on
10/14/2004 1:24:44 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(We have low inflation and and low unemployment.)
To: PatrickHenry
A cheap place to put a nuclear power station to generate the beam is ... the Moon.
8 posted on
10/14/2004 1:25:08 PM PDT by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: PatrickHenry
So, what do they do with the reverse acceleration given the beam GENERATOR?
11 posted on
10/14/2004 1:27:41 PM PDT by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
To: PatrickHenry
Let me take a shot at this:
If the plasma beam is sent TO Mars and the "sails" are pushed in that direction - what drives the "sails" on the return leg. Half of a two and a half year voyage is still fifteen months - not ninety days.
12 posted on
10/14/2004 1:28:38 PM PDT by
azhenfud
("He who is always looking up seldom finds others' lost change...")
To: PatrickHenry
My physics is a little rusty...
Do magnetized ions have mass? If so, then would that require this device to be anchored on a large mass, like a planet/moon/etc or have some sort of opposite force to keep the device in place in space as the ions spew out?
To: PatrickHenry
I don't get it..
Is it like putting a carrot on a string in front of a donkey ?..
or useing spurs and whip to motivate the donkey from behind..?
or even like useing an electric fan in a sailboat..
How does it work ?
18 posted on
10/14/2004 1:50:38 PM PDT by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: PatrickHenry
Must be lonely at the top....
21 posted on
10/14/2004 1:51:23 PM PDT by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population - have them spayed or neutered.©)
To: PatrickHenry
Obvious problems with this concept:
#1 Good luck keeping a space ship in that tiny stream over billions of miles. That's like trying to urinate from the top of HalfDome in Yosemite and land it in a thimble at the bottom of the hill.
#2 I'm pretty sure that mega-beam would be bad for your nuts.
To: PatrickHenry
Interesting schtuff. But it doesn't appear practical. The destination would be bombarded with particles. Not sure, but there must be some mass involved in order to move an object, would there be any effect on the orbit of the destination planet? The article states one would have to be at the destination to slow the vehicle down, I wouldn't want to be around during a brown out, or an eclipse on the return flight. There would be one shot, or get pushed to Pluto.... But then again, unlike Kerry/Edwards, we haven't been there either.
25 posted on
10/14/2004 1:56:48 PM PDT by
Ijo
To: PatrickHenry
Under the mag-beam concept, a space-based station would generate a stream of magnetized ions that would interact with a magnetic sail on a spacecraft and propel it through the solar system at high speeds that increase with the size of the plasma beam. Just a thought, but without primary propulsion on board, how do you stop?
27 posted on
10/14/2004 2:00:39 PM PDT by
The_Victor
(Calvin: "Do tigers wear pajamas?", Hobbes: "Truth is we never take them off.")
To: PatrickHenry
But to make such high speeds practical, another plasma unit must be stationed on a platform at the other end of the trip This sounds just light the light sail in The Mote in God's Eye, only not so pretty to look at.
28 posted on
10/14/2004 2:01:32 PM PDT by
Pilsner
To: PatrickHenry
There is a large deposit of dilithium crystals on Mars.
33 posted on
10/14/2004 2:08:29 PM PDT by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: PatrickHenry
To: PatrickHenry
I can get to work in 3.6 seconds instead of 38 minutes?
Where do I get one?
35 posted on
10/14/2004 2:13:01 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
To: PatrickHenry
Does this count?
![](http://www.duffgardens.net/media/images/2001.gif)
41 posted on
10/14/2004 2:28:45 PM PDT by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: PatrickHenry
"But to make such high speeds practical, another plasma unit must be stationed on a platform at the other end of the trip to apply brakes to the spacecraft"
I'm sorry, but THAT mental picture set off SUCH a gigglin' fit! And yes, Texas men DO giggle occasionally!
42 posted on
10/14/2004 2:36:03 PM PDT by
jagusafr
(Hit the brakes - no, NOW! NOWWW!! AAAAUUUUUGGGGHGHHHH!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson