The ABC's of Media Bias (Halperin's father associated with Soros)

FrontPage Magazine ^ | October 14, 2004 | Lowell Ponte

[hipaatwo]

IS THE ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA BIASED against conservatives? Dan Rather remains in the anchor chair at the CBS Evening News despite his involvement in recent news stories based on dishonest reporting, fabricated documents and even Internet gossip falsely alleging that President George W. Bush secretly intends to begin the military conscription of students. These stories were obviously designed to damage Mr. Bush in the final weeks before a national election.

And now ABC News has left in place its Political Director Mark Halperin. ABC has done this despite the network’s acknowledgement that Halperin wrote a memo that to many seems to direct ABC reporters, anchors and producers to slant its coverage by downplaying the misstatements of Democratic presidential candidate Senator John Kerry and by viewing negatively any misstatements by Republican candidate Bush.

Halperin’s directive reached ABC people on October 8, the very day that ABC “Good Morning America” co-host Charlie Gibson would be selecting questions for and moderating the second presidential debate between Bush and Kerry. Did Halperin intend to influence Gibson’s decisions in this debate?

Who is Mark Halperin, and does his memo reflect leftwing bias in his shaping of the news at ABC? To find answers to these questions, we need to consider the details of this memo-gate controversy in the light of Halperin’s past and of the famous radical left-wing father who shaped his political values. As we shall discover, Halperin has veered Left and crossed the line of ethical journalism many times.

[PhilipFreneau]

>> And plus the Soros link surfaces

Did you know that Soros virtually owned Harken Energy when Harken bought out Bush's company, Spectrum Energy (Soros owned 46% of Harken's stock at the time)? Did you know that French authorities fined Soros $2.2 million in 2002 for insider trading in connection with a bank takeover in 1988? Did you know that Malaysian authorities vilified him for bringing down the country's currency during Asia's 1997 financial crisis? Did you know that Soros has been called "the man who broke the Bank of England," for his successful bet against the British pound in 1992, and "the Daddy Warbucks of drug legalization" by former U.S. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Joseph Califano, after Soros gave financial support to two state ballot initiatives legalizing the medicinal use of marijuana in 1996?

Soros is a "Secular Jew", which means he is not a real Jew, but an instrument of Satan. In other words, Soros is a very dangerous being (not a human being, as we know them). When you ponder the true evil "people" of the world, many will be "Secular Jews". That is, many who claim to be Jews are not really Jews, but are, in fact, the synagogue of Satan (see Revelation 2:9 and 3:9).

The only real Jews are the Orthodox Jews. They are to be loved and respected. The rest are dangerous, Satan worshipping, liars, like George Soros, Ted Koppel, Barbara Streisand, Stephen Spielberg, Alec Baldwin, Richard Ben-Veniste, Andrea Mitchell, Robert Rubin, Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger, James Rubin, and William Cohen. There are many others.

[Diogenes]

But Soros is said to have a sinister master behind him, none other than the House of Rothschild in Paris which owns the Credit Suisse Bank, and God knows how many other banks in Switzerland and elsewhere! Does anybody know why the Rothschilds earlier this week appointed Rohatyn, a former Lazard Freres director, NYC bailout maverick, and a Clinton appointee as Ambassador to France, to be a director of the Rothschild banking group in France? I am sure that Volcker's investigation of Saddam's Food-For-Oil scam, with its ramifications in France and Switzerland, is not making any progress because these big-league players are preventing him from looking in too deeply! In other words, the big boys can always let the smaller puppets take millions in bribes that they will hold for them in secure numbered accounts in Geneva or Lausanne banks, as long as the puppets perform or jump to their string-pulling (the Chiracs, Kofi Annan, Schroeder, etc., etc.)! If two hundred and fifty years ago the Rothschilds controlled the purse that allowed Europeans to fight among themselves, what makes us feel sure they're not doing it right now?!