[Xenalyte]

One more time, and I will use short words in hopes that you get it.

Without us knowing EXACTLY HOW the numbers were arrived at, we have no way to judge whether they are accurate.

Therefore, they are suspect.

That they support your argument does not make them a) valid or b) true.

I'm not saying they are false . . . I am saying that without underlying methodology, they are suspect and worthless. They could be perfectly correct, but without methodology, they are worthless.

Now if you'll excuse me, I must go deal with grown-ups.

[BushisTheMan]

Well, I think you are spinning. You are dissing a government statistical report as nonsense because it disagrees with your biased concept.

And you infer YOU are the grownup?