Sorry for butting in -- but you haven't brought any statistics to the discussion to support your position.
All you have brought forth is one single case of "anecdotal evidence", your own.
Why don't all of these "under-paid" women leave those male dominated companies, start their own "all women" companies, and beat the pants of those male dominated companies? You all can start "all women" banks, "all women" insurance companies, "all women" factories, "all women" farms, etc. etc.
When you capture all of the market share, and put all the male dominated companies out of business, you can then hire all those out-of-work men and pay them measly little salaries. Ahhh, the sweet taste of revenge.
I think it's a grand plan and you should jump right on it.
BITM will do that right after she starts making sense, which she'll do right after Fiji freezes over.
You are wrong. I believe I quoted a Newsweek article.
I see underlining and quotes are the new emphasis.
I think you've gone a little off the deep end with your argument.