Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush not worried about Osama Bin Laden
vanity ^ | today | vanity

Posted on 10/13/2004 9:41:35 PM PDT by cincinnati65

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
Haven't yet seen what is supposed to be so controversial about this. I was just disappointed. Fox News was the only one I saw that played the comment, and they cut it off mid-sentence.
1 posted on 10/13/2004 9:41:35 PM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

Sorry, I was disappointed in Fox News for cutting off the comment midsentence. Didn't think that was too clear.


2 posted on 10/13/2004 9:44:36 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Just up the road a piece.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

Although questionable audio has been released. No video of Bin Laden has been released since Tora Bora.

IMHO, He is dead.


3 posted on 10/13/2004 9:44:38 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Bush has such a good sense of humor and I always took it to mean, "I'm not much worried about Osama, he should be worried about US"!!!!!!!!!!
4 posted on 10/13/2004 9:45:29 PM PDT by soozla ("I used to think I was indecisive, but now I'm not too sure............"-John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

I think Bush is right on the money. The problem is much bigger then any one person. Focusing on just one person just is another indication of how completely unfit Kerry is. Kerry seems to think if we kill or capture Bin Laden we can go back to a 9-10 Mindset. We cannot.


5 posted on 10/13/2004 9:45:53 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

I thought they clipped his response,thanks for posting what was really said.


6 posted on 10/13/2004 9:46:59 PM PDT by linn37 (Have you hugged your Phlebotomist today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I agree. That's why I felt it was important to post the entire question and answer in context.


7 posted on 10/13/2004 9:47:20 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Just up the road a piece.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

Yes, they did cut it off mid sentence, and the whole conversation (above)CLEARLY points out the reason he's not concerned about him is because he is EFFECTIVLY DEAD even if alive. He is so deep in his spider hole he can't even talk to his own people.


People should be e-mailing this to every station and newspaper in the land.


8 posted on 10/13/2004 9:47:44 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65; All

The War on Terror is larger than just one man. Would Kerry pull his Pampers up, declare the war over, and pretend all is back to normal if we captured (or proved dead) Bin Laden?


9 posted on 10/13/2004 9:49:59 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Yes I was appalled by that. It seemed like the sentence was snipped way short. Who's side is fox on ?

For all we know it could have been part of a sentence that made perfect sense

for instance: "I'm not really worried about Bin Laden" ///snip// [as much as I am about neutralizing the entire Al Queda network worldwide.]

and besides that what good is it to worry,

worry never helped any leader solve a problem

10 posted on 10/13/2004 9:52:01 PM PDT by Freesofar (The "F" in John F stands for Fool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freesofar

What got me is how OBVIOUS it was that he was still speaking.....


11 posted on 10/13/2004 9:57:44 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Just up the road a piece.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
When MSNBC's Brian Williams was going over some of the "inconsistencies" said during tonight's debate, he mentioned Bush's comment about how Kerry wants to reduce terrorism to a nuisance, like prostitution and illegal gambling. Williams couldn't get the full text of Kerry's magazine article spewage up on the screen fast enough in order to, as he said, bring it into it's proper context.

He then mentioned Kerry's charge that Bush had said he wasn't concerned about Osama.

Williams, in an attempt to "bring it into it's proper context, simply played the video tape of the Bush pc that contained the following text.....

I don't know where he is. I -- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him.

That was it....no more.

12 posted on 10/13/2004 9:58:09 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

Thanks for the post. Now lets send this to Alan Combs so HE UNDERSTANDS What W was talking about.


13 posted on 10/13/2004 10:01:09 PM PDT by rineaux (hardcore for W04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

I'm not all that much worried about OBL either, since I have confidence in those in charge in DC just now.


14 posted on 10/13/2004 10:01:19 PM PDT by Ramius (Time? What time do you think we have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
The Democrats' concern about finding bin Laden more than in finding and destroying his organization is revealing in itself. The Dims are more concerned with symbolic victory than with real victory. If finding Saddam didn't stop the terrorists from operating in Iraq, finding bin Laden won't put an end to al Quaida either.

No doubt killing bin Laden would be a psychological victory, and his head would be a great war trophy, but it would not mean the end to the War on Terror. So Bush is quite correct in asserting that bin Laden has been marginalized and reduced to hiding in a cave, and that seeking out and destroying his terror organization is more important than capturing him. Too much focus on just one man would surely undermine the broader war on terror.

15 posted on 10/13/2004 10:03:24 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
"What got me is how OBVIOUS it was that he was still speaking..."

Apparently, not all the editors and managers over there at Fox are interested in showing people the truth. And hiding the truth helps Kerry, whose campaign is founded on endless lies.

16 posted on 10/13/2004 10:06:04 PM PDT by TheCrusader ("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II (c 1097 a.d.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

According to the dumokrats, Ashcroft has OBL down in the basement of the Justice Dept (violating his civil rights by poking him with a stick) getting him ready to pull out in a week or so. Maybe that is why W isn't concerned about him.


17 posted on 10/13/2004 10:07:48 PM PDT by ottothedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ottothedog

Of course, when we sent the "warlords" to get Osama, wasn't THAT working with our coalition in Afghanistan?


18 posted on 10/13/2004 10:14:41 PM PDT by cincinnati65 (Just up the road a piece.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

To paraphrase Sore Loserman, "that's not the right coalition" (i.e. not the frenchies)...WSJ has good editorial on sKerry's charge of outsourcing @ Tora Bora...


19 posted on 10/13/2004 10:22:41 PM PDT by ottothedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

When you're the leader of a nation like our's, you have to voice thoughts that strengthen your position, not undermine it.

The idea that an uncaught Bin Laden would signify failure of the U.S. efforts against terrorism, had to be put to rest.

Bush conveyed the thought that Laden, caught or not, wouldn't have much impact on the win/loss of the war on terrorism. He played down his significance with some casual remarks. He was right to do so.

Kerry would steal and sell his grandmothers false teeth if he thought it would gain him political ground. That same Kerry sold out the nation in an effort to damn Bush for downplaying Laden's significance related to the win/loss of the war on terrorism. By doing this, he actually lofts Laden as someone who's capture is indeed integral to the win/loss of the War on Terrorism. Nice move butthead.

Kerry really is a tragicly flawed jerk.


20 posted on 10/13/2004 10:24:43 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson