Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bigeasy_70118

Thanks for the analysis. : )

I could tell from a previous post that you're a lawyer who knows what he's talking about.

What I imagine is going on is that Morelli & Assoc. filed the suit for defensive purposes, knowing that they will get conflicted out of the case - thus the firm will now step aside without much of a fight.

But you never know; this Morelli guy is an interesting character:

http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/crimelaw/features/2323/


312 posted on 10/13/2004 2:41:06 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: BCrago66
Thanks.

I am involved in defending a case right now that involves an advesary party suing an opposing attorneys. The thing is a mess and a lot of the issues that are going to arise in the FNC case, have already arisen in mine.

It's up to FNC to conflict Morelli out of the harrassment case. I'll assume he'll fight it. But in the FNC extortion suit, there's no way, Mackris can be represented by Morelli.

318 posted on 10/13/2004 2:44:04 PM PDT by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson