Skip to comments.
California: Poll: Voters favor softening of '3 strikes' law
San Jose Mercury News ^
| 13 October 2004
| Howard Mintz
Posted on 10/13/2004 11:09:24 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Richard Temple, a consultant for the anti-66 campaign, said the Field Poll numbers can still be turned around before the election. (Governor Arnold) Schwarzenegger is expected to make a pitch against Proposition 66 in the coming weeks.
2
posted on
10/13/2004 11:10:50 AM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
("... But the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.")
To: CounterCounterCulture
3
posted on
10/13/2004 11:11:42 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(NEED SOME WOOD?)
To: Porterville
4
posted on
10/13/2004 11:12:54 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: CounterCounterCulture
Like HELL WE DO!
More liberal bias from the Soviet State of Kalifornia
5
posted on
10/13/2004 11:13:11 AM PDT
by
BurbankErnie
(I am an oxymoron - a California Republican)
To: CounterCounterCulture
If someone has two strikes and is still out commiting crimes even if it is petty theft or pot carrying then I have no tears for em cause they are rather stupid
Well,let's see two strikes,one more and I go away for long time....I think i'll steal a snickers
6
posted on
10/13/2004 11:14:01 AM PDT
by
skaterboy
To: MrShoop
If an ex felon defends themselves they can go to jail for life. Ex felons typically live in violent neighborhoods. Felonys can be quite small these day; drunk drivers are felons.
The law is wrong.
7
posted on
10/13/2004 11:17:17 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(NEED SOME WOOD?)
To: BurbankErnie
Do you realize that you are seen as potential inventory for the state of California?
8
posted on
10/13/2004 11:18:13 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(NEED SOME WOOD?)
To: skaterboy
Well,let's see two strikes,one more and I go away for long time....I think i'll steal a snickersAnd if there are no witnesses, I won't get caught.
9
posted on
10/13/2004 11:21:16 AM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: skaterboy
From the voter pamphlet:
Selected felonies no longer considered violent or serious offenses under Proposition 66
- Attempted burglary
- Conspiracry (multiple people planning) to commit assault
- Nonresidential arson resulting in no significant injuries
- Threats to commit criminal acts that would result in significant personal injury
- Burglary of an unoccupied residence
- Interfering with a trial witness without the use of force or threats and not in the furtherance of a conspiracy
- Participation in felonies committed by a criminal street gang
- Unintentional infliction of significant personal injury while committing a felony offense.
10
posted on
10/13/2004 11:21:41 AM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
("... But the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.")
To: BurbankErnie
More liberal bias from the Soviet State of Kalifornia It's amazing that California shifted so quickly to the left. This is the state that put Goldwater over the top in 1964, launched Ronald Reagan on the road to the presidency, and elected a conservative Republican governor (George Deukmejian) as late as 1986.
To: Porterville
Felonys can be quite small these day; drunk drivers are felons.I don't know of any 'small' felonies. Felony drunk runk driving after two violent felonies......send em away
12
posted on
10/13/2004 11:30:16 AM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Porterville
If an ex-con defends themself they can go to jail for life? What does that even mean? I'd tranlate to: If an ex-con who has already committed two violent felonies and commits a third crime like buglary, and for some reason turns down free state representation tio represent themselves, has a chance of being convicted, and if convicted wil get life for a third strike. thank god for that.
13
posted on
10/13/2004 11:30:34 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
To: CounterCounterCulture
Thank you for posting the list of felonies not considered violent or serious. I would have considered voting for this if I hadn't seen what you posted.
To: Porterville; hchutch; mhking; rdb3; dighton; aculeus; general_re
If an ex felon defends themselves they can go to jail for life. Ex felons typically live in violent neighborhoods. Felonys can be quite small these day; drunk drivers are felons.Two violent felonies are required to be eligible for the three-strikes law.
As for violent felons having to defend themselves because they live in violent neighborhoods: those neighborhoods are violent because of (drum roll, please):
The violent felons!
15
posted on
10/13/2004 11:33:04 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER...SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER)
To: MrShoop
Like I said, you are potential inventory, and you want to push people in line.
16
posted on
10/13/2004 11:33:26 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(NEED SOME WOOD?)
To: Doctor Stochastic
for the record, shoplifting a snickers wouldn't qualify as a thrid strike. grabbing one out of a kid's hand could, and should.
17
posted on
10/13/2004 11:33:43 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
From the voter pamphlet:
Resentencing of offenders. This measure requires the state to resentence offenders currently serving an indeterminate life sentence under the Three Strikes law if their third strike resulted from a conviction for a nonviolent and nonserious felony offense, as defined by this proposition. Resentencing must occur no later than 180 days after this measure takes effect. The resentencing requirement will result in reduced prison sentences for some inmates and release from prison for others.
18
posted on
10/13/2004 11:34:05 AM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
("... But the senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity.")
You would take away the right of a man to defend themselves? How many people does CA stock behind prison walls in order to support backwater towns without any industry? Think about it. The legal system in CA is a living beast that needs more fuel. Is it any wonder that the strongest lobbyist group in CA is the Prison Guard Union?...
19
posted on
10/13/2004 11:36:53 AM PDT
by
Porterville
(NEED SOME WOOD?)
To: Porterville
Please stop misinforming people. Drunk driving is NOT a felony in California.
23152(a) It is a misdemeanor to drive under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs.
23152(b) It is a misdemeanor to drive with .08% or more of alcohol in your blood.
The only time drunk driving can be felony is if you cause injury while drunk driving.
If you think three strikes is so bad, please give us some examples of the most egregious abuse of the law. opponents never do because every time you look at the people's record, you see they really deserved it.
20
posted on
10/13/2004 11:38:24 AM PDT
by
Wayne07
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson