Of course they are. They've been maintaining the existing roads for eons.
So if there is not a reasonable existing free route then you don't get new roads and you do not provide the infrastucture needed for growth and prosperity for your citizens. I am open to other suggestions but again, all I hear is "we don't want it" but you still want roads.....
I mispoke. We want to build a road. There is either an existing free alternate available or there isn't. If there isn't, then make the new road a toll road. If there is, then make the new road a toll road and leave the free road alone.
My problem is that they are turning free roads into toll roads where there ISN'T an existing [reasonable & free] alternative. SH121 north of Dallas is an example. There is no reasonable way to get from The Colony/Frisco to points east or west except SH121. There are NO backstreet routes - the only way to do it is to drive 100 miles out of your way. They want to turn it into a toll road to pay for new roads elsewhere - roads that won't be used by the SH121 drivers.
Aren't they going to toll 121 in order to convert the existing road to a high speed road? If I am not mistaken, the last time I drove on 121 it was a nightmare- traffic jams and lights for miles. That is what the tolls would pay for. you could get from the East to the West in half or 1/3 of the time it takes currently. Aren't there alternatives such as Parker or Park or Legacy or Rosemead, or Franfurt?