To: Skooz
For what it's worth, the student was of consenting age for most of the countries in the world. Just pointing that out.
55 posted on
10/13/2004 9:02:20 AM PDT by
demlosers
(The FreeRepublic Pajama Press!)
To: demlosers
"For what it's worth, the student was of consenting age for most of the countries in the world. Just pointing that out."
He was not in a position to consent. She, as the power-holder in the professional relationship (teacher/student, parent/child, therapist/patient, etc) had a professional responsibility to ensure that no such relationship would happen. For this reason alone, regardless of legality, if the accusations are, she should be fired and barred from teaching ever again.
83 posted on
10/13/2004 9:22:09 AM PDT by
NJ_gent
(Conservatism begins at home. Security begins at the border. Please, someone, secure our borders.)
To: demlosers
"For what it's worth, the student was of consenting age for most of the countries in the world. Just pointing that out."
So, it would be the same if the student was a 16-year-old girl and the teacher a man? She'd be of consenting age, too. There's an ugly double standard going on here.
98 posted on
10/13/2004 9:41:25 AM PDT by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson