Replies

Salon is just pissed because we have made national headlines for our part in showing the rest of America what we already knew about Dan Rather.

It's telling that they had to go all the way back to 2003 for the "shocking" quotes about the Massachusetts Supremes' crime against logic and the nuclear family. What they fail to realize is that all of us "pseudonymous venom" spitters is that we make up the majority. If the truth was told about that court decision, everyone would know that the advocates of same-sex marriage in the legislature broke their own law in order to thwart an anti-gay marriage referendum that should have been on a statewide ballot before that decision.

The left will be in for a rude awakening when the same 90% that was against the 9th Circuit's ruling on the removal of God in the Pledge Of Allegiance will also ban same sex marriages by shooting it down in the years to come in the electoral process.

He certainly couldn't cite the earlier threads about the court ruling from the Supremes that struck down all sex laws (sodomy laws for now but in reality laws outlawing prostitution and other "crimes" between consenting adults in private).

That is because those threads warned of the looming reality of same sex marriage. Santorum and others were called "extremists" who were exaggerating. Their warnings have come to pass.

If group sex is legal, why isn't group marriage? I'd bet that there are more nations that currently have polygamy than have same sex marriage as a legal union.

The left says that it is a "scare tactic" to claim that they are pushing the age of consent down but it has ALREADY happened. Some states had laws prohibiting same sex sodomy for anyone under 18. When the sodomy laws were killed by the activist court, the distinction between same sex and complementary sex acts was dropped FOR ALL AGES. So much that this was about "consenting ADULTS".