Yes, so Bush should have pointed out that Kerry judges are the type who would use their ideology to interpret the Constitution. Kerry judges would read the Constitution and come away declaring that it requires gay marriage, bars the most reasonable restrictions on abortion, etc.
He needed to include some concrete, specific examples to go along with the sound conceptual response he gave. He needs to put a face on the concept.
He said what he said with clarity and was concise. You can't do better than that. He didn't scare off my daughters who fear the recriminalization of abortion. That means a lot because they will vote for Bush based on what he said.