Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: counterpunch

since the source here is SeeBS, the attempt is being made here

to show how kerry's "nuisance" remark is NO DIFFERENT than

the President referring to terrorists as "flies". See that ?


10 posted on 10/11/2004 10:42:31 AM PDT by kingattax (FreeRepublic leads...others follow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kingattax

Oh, I saw that clearly.

Problem is, it doesn't work. ;-D

If it DID work, it would be headlines. But it doesn't.


12 posted on 10/11/2004 10:45:25 AM PDT by Judith Anne (First we were digital brownshirts then we were pajamahadeen, now we're the piranha of the internet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: kingattax
This article is over a year old.
I made the inference, not CBS.

The idea here is that Bush made the decision to depart the Clinton era policy of "swatting at flies" which lead to a whole lot of nothing, and to engage the terrorists in all out war.

Kerry still sees terrorism through the prism of September 10th. He still sees terrorism as a "nuisance", like those flies that Clinton would occasionally swat.

Kerry just said that we need to return to the Clinton law enforcement approach to terrorism, and the comparison of "nuisance" to "swatting at flies" is the most succinct way of exposing just where Kerry really stands.

Kerry's "tough talk" on the campaign trail has been nothing but empty rhetoric. He still lives in a September 10th world. His facade has finally cracked, and the light of day is starting to shine through.
15 posted on 10/11/2004 10:50:32 AM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson